Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5398 Guj
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2023
C/FA/1923/2019 ORDER DATED: 10/07/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1923 of 2019
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1436 of 2019
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1438 of 2019
==========================================================
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
HIMMATNAGAR
Versus
RANJITSINH HIMMATSINH PARMAR
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR PARESH M DARJI(3700) for the Defendant(s) No. 3
RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 10/07/2023
COMMON ORAL ORDER
1. The appeals are against the common order and
judgment in MACP nos.242, 243 and 244/12
decided by the learned MACT, Gandhinagar on
5.10.2018 on the ground that the vehicle
involved was driven on road without any permit
in violation of the terms and conditions of
the policy and against the provision of
Section 66 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
C/FA/1923/2019 ORDER DATED: 10/07/2023
2. Mr. Nanavati, learned advocate for the
appellant while referring to the grounds
raised in the appeal memo stated that at the
time of the accident, there was no driving
license of the opponent no.1 as well as the
vehicle was not having permit and thus, the
insurance Company would not be liable to pay
the compensation amount.
3. While countering the same, Mr. Darji, learned
advocate for the claimants contended that no
such issues were raised during the course of
trial. Further, the insurance Company had not
examined any witness from their side to even
contend such pleas. Mr. Darji further stated
that now the time has come where the Tribunals
are required to mandatorily call for all the
information under Form 54 of Central Motor
Vehicle Act by following the judgment in the
case of Jai Prakash v. National Insurance
Company Limited, reported in (2010) 2 SCC 607
where in absence of the owner and driver, such
C/FA/1923/2019 ORDER DATED: 10/07/2023
facts can be brought on record of the case and
the claimants have not to rush from pillar to
post for all such documents.
4. Mr. Darji stated that the claimants have found
that the Bolero car bearing registration
no.GJ-18 AU-5773 was having a fitness
certificate till 5.6.2012 and the driving
license was already produced on record and
contract carriage permit was for the period
from 7.6.2011 to 6.6.2016 and even PUC
certificate was given by the officer of RTO
office, Gandhinagar.
5. A perusal of the judgment suggests that the
issue was not raised by the Tribunal while
plea was taken in the written statement by the
insurance Company, while no discussion has
been made in the judgment with regard to
permit of the vehicle. In that circumstances,
the parties are required to be granted
opportunity so that all necessary documents
C/FA/1923/2019 ORDER DATED: 10/07/2023
come on record and the Tribunal thereafter can
decide the liability aspect of payment of
compensation. In that circumstances, all the
matters are remanded back and ordered to be
restored to the file of the concerned Tribunal
where the Tribunal is directed only to
consider and decide the liability aspect and
for that purpose, opportunity is granted to
all the parties to produce relevant documents
to prove the same. Accordingly, the present
appeals are disposed of. Let this exercise be
completed within a period of three months from
the date of receipt of this order. Interim
order passed on 28.10.2020 regarding
disbursement of the money would continue till
final disposal of the matters.
(GITA GOPI,J) Maulik
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!