Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 695 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2023
C/SCA/1254/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1254 of 2023
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1253 of 2023
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1252 of 2023
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1251 of 2023
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1250 of 2023
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1249 of 2023
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1248 of 2023
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1247 of 2023
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1246 of 2023
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1245 of 2023
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
==========================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India or any order made thereunder ?
==========================================================
DIPAK STONE SUPPLIERS
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS POONAM M MAHETA(11265) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
Page 1 of 5
Downloaded on : Mon Jan 30 20:37:39 IST 2023
C/SCA/1254/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MS.DHARITRI PANCHOLI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 in SCA NOS.
1254, 1253, 1252, 1251, 1250 AND 1245 of 2023
MR.JAY TRIVEDI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 in SCA NOS.1248 and
1249 of 2023
MR.SANJAY UDHWANI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 in SCA NOS.
1246 and 1247 of 2023
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 25/01/2023
COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT
1. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned AGPs
waive service of notice of Rule on behalf of the
respondent State.
2. With the consent of learned advocates for the
respective parties, the petition is taken up for
final hearing.
3. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the prayer is made for a
direction to the respondent authorities not to
prohibit the ongoing mining activity of the
C/SCA/1254/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
petitioner in the land in question.
4. The prayer further was that a direction be issued
to the respondent authorities to consider the
representations dated 16.01.2023 and provide an
opportunity of hearing before taking out any
proceedings pursuant to the representation
dated 03.10.2022.
5. It appears that a petitioner-one Mohanbhai
Laljibhai Maksana had filed Special Civil
Application No.25844 of 2022 requesting the
Court that a direction be issued that the
complaint with regard to illegal mining be
inquired into and his representation be decided.
6. In the said petition, the Court passed the
following order:
" The only prayer made in this petition is to decide the application of the petitioners dated 03.10.2022.
C/SCA/1254/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
The respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
With the above direction, the petition stands disposed of. Direct Service is permitted."
7. The present petitioner, therefore, as is evident
from the averments made in para 2 made
representations apprehending that these
complaints at the hands of the petitioner of
Special Civil Application No.25884 of 2022 will
be decided without giving an opportunity of
hearing to the petitioner herein. However,
pursuant to the order of this Court dated
19.12.2022 passed in Special Civil Application
No.25448 of 2022, the Competent Authority has
issued a notice dated 19.01.2023 calling the
petitioners for a personal hearing.
8. An apprehension of the petitioner therefore that
C/SCA/1254/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/01/2023
the petitioner shall not be heard, is now
answered.
9. Needless to say that when the petitioners are
offered hearing, it shall so be done and orders, if
any, shall be passed after hearing the petitioners
in accordance with law.
10. It will be open for the petitioners to furnish
additional documents if thought fit to support
their representations made earlier.
11. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the
merits of these matters.
12. Petitions are disposed of. Rule is made absolute
to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
permitted.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) ANKIT SHAH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!