Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3457 Guj
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2023
C/SCA/4068/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 27/04/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4068 of 2023
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MAUNA M. BHATT sd/-
==========================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed No
to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? No
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy No
of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question No
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India or any order made thereunder ?
==========================================================
LAXMANJI POPATJI THAKORE
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR CB DASTOOR(238) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
MS JYOTI BHATT, AGP for Respondent - State
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MAUNA M. BHATT
Date : 27/04/2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government
Pleader Ms. Jyoti Bhatt waives service of notice of Rule on
behalf of the respondent - State.
C/SCA/4068/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 27/04/2023
2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
is filed with the following prayers: -
A. Allow this Special Civil Application.
B. Your Lordship be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the respondents to consider the case of petitioners for the grating the benefits of leave encashment to the extent of 300 days considering the total length of service of petitioners within a stipulated time as fixed by the Hon'ble Court and thereby be please to quash and set aside the impugned inaction of respondents in not granting the said benefits as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of article 14 and 16 fo the Constitution of India.
C. Your Lordship be please to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order of direction directing the respondents to grant the benefits of the government Holidays as per the Government Circular and Judgment of Hon'ble Court.
D. Grant any other and further relief in the interest of justice.
3. Heard learned advocate Mr. C. B. Dastoor for the
petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Jyoti
Bhatt for the respondent - State.
C/SCA/4068/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 27/04/2023
4. Learned advocate for the petitioners submitted that the
issue in the present petition pertains to grant of benefit of 300
days unavailed earned leave and not calculating the
retirement benefits of the petitioners from the date of
appointment. The prayers in relation to other benefits, if any,
referred in this petition, is not pressed at this stage.
4.1 He further pointed out that the issue involved in the
present petition which is in relation to payment of leave
encashment for 300 days leave as also counting the retirement
benefits available to the petitioners from the date of their
appointment, is no more res integra in view of decision of
Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 01.09.2022, in Special Leave
Petition (C) No. 7229 of 2022. Learned advocate for the
petitioner submitted that present petitioners were working
with the respondent No. 3 department with more than 3
decades and they all had retired upon attaining the age of
superannuation and therefore considering their continuous
service they are entitled for the benefits of leave encashment.
4.2 He pointed out that by Government Resolution dated
21.10.2022 of Irrigation Department, Gandhinagar had issued
C/SCA/4068/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 27/04/2023
directives for implementation of the decision of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (C) No.7229 of 2022.
5. In relation to leave encashment vide Government
Resolution dated 21.10.2022 issued by the Irrigation
Department, Gandhinagar has also taken a policy decision
which reads as under: -
"According to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court referred in No. (1) above, since the Resolution of the Roads and Buildings Department dated 17-10-1988 also provides that the retirement benefits granted to daily workers include the benefit of "encashment of leave" also, as per the clause (5) of the State Litigation Policy of the State Government, daily wages workers are entitled to the benefit of conversion of leave into cash, the instructions in this regard regarding the payment of leave encashment to the daily wages worker petitioner under this section, instructions are hereby circulated as per the approval received vide informal note dated 17/10/2022 of the Finance Department on the equal numbered files as follows.
With reference to various claims filed before the Hon'ble Court, the petitioner daily wagers shall be paid the encashment of accrued leave (within the maximum limit of 300 leave accumulated) in cash as is being paid for regular services as per the policy of the Government, by calculating leave as per
C/SCA/4068/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 27/04/2023
the rules on the basis of the service record of the daily workers.
(1) Payment in case of retired petitioners who have completed 70 years of age as on 01/10/2022, shall be made by 31/10/2022,
(2) Payment to the remaining retired petitioner daily workers will be within three months i.e. by 31/12/2022."
6. The above factual position could not be controverted by
learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent -
State.
7. In view of the abovesaid position, this Court deems it
appropriate to direct the respondents to undertake scrutiny of
individual cases of each of the petitioners herein, and upon
such scrutiny, if they are found eligible then a proposal shall be
forwarded to the State Authorities in this regard and
thereafter, the State Authority shall consider proposal of each
of the petitioners herein expeditiously and in consonance with
the State policy.
8. It is reported that in many of such matters, the
concerned department has already moved a proposal to the
C/SCA/4068/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 27/04/2023
State Government in this regard. However, wherever such
proposal is not moved, the same shall be moved by the
concerned department within a period of eight weeks from the
date of receipt of copy of writ of this order.
9. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period
of twelve weeks from today.
10. With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Rule
is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
permitted. sd/-
(MAUNA M. BHATT,J) SHRIJIT PILLAI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!