Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravibhai Rameshbhai Rupapara ... vs State Of Gujarat
2023 Latest Caselaw 2836 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2836 Guj
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2023

Gujarat High Court
Ravibhai Rameshbhai Rupapara ... vs State Of Gujarat on 10 April, 2023
Bench: Nisha M. Thakore
   R/CR.MA/4413/2023                        ORDER DATED: 10/04/2023




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 4413 of 2023
             In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 508 of 2023
                            With
              R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 508 of 2023
==========================================================
    RAVIBHAI RAMESHBHAI RUPAPARA PROP. OF DHANANJAY
                        FASHION
                         Versus
                   STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR JIGAR L PATEL(11596) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
Mr. Bhargav Pandya, Addl.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR                   for      the
Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
                  Date : 10/04/2023
                    ORAL ORDER

1.0. Heard Mr. Jigar L Patel, learned advocate for the applicant- original complainant. Issue Rule making it returnable forthwith. Mr. Bhargav Pandya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent- State.

2.0. This is an application seeking leave to challenge the impugned judgment and order of acquittal dated 27.12.2022 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat in Criminal Case No.4554 of 2017, whereby, the learned Magistrate has recorded order of acquittal of respondent no.2- accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

R/CR.MA/4413/2023 ORDER DATED: 10/04/2023

3.0. Mr. Patel, learned advocate for the applicant- original complainant has invited attention of this Court to the findings and reasons recorded by the learned Magistrate while recording order of acquittal of respondent no.2- original accused. He has submitted that there is no dispute with regard to the signature of the accused on the disputed cheque. The learned trial Court ought to have raised the presumption in favour of the complainant under Section 118 A and Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He has submitted that it is the case of the complainant that being proprietor of the Dhananjay Fashion, accused and the complainant were knowing each other since long. Considering request of the accused, amount of Rs.9 lakhs was withdrawn by the complainant and was given as hand loan to the accused. He has placed on record the application Exh.36 which was submitted by the original complainant seeking permission of the trial Court to place on record the relevant document, which is the copy of the Income Tax Return along with the schedule of trading and profit and loss account for the concerned Financial Year. By referring to the aforesaid document, he has submitted that under the head of loan and advance reference was made about such hand loan being given to the respondent no.2- accused. However, the trial Court failed to appreciate the aforesaid document and proceeded to record the order of acquittal.

4.0. Considering the submissions made by the learned advocate for the applicant- original complainant and the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, prima facie, the Court finds that in absence of dispute being raised with regard to signature on the

R/CR.MA/4413/2023 ORDER DATED: 10/04/2023

disputed cheque, the statutory presumption had arisen in favour of the original complainant with regard to existence of legally enforceable debt as on the date of presentation of the cheque. Though, the defence was raised at the stage of cross examination of the complainant and material had come on record to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, the matter requires consideration. Hence, the present application is allowed and Leave to Appeal, as prayed for, is hereby granted.

Order in Criminal Appeal

The appeal is admitted. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of admission on behalf of respondent-State.

Issue bailable warrant in sum of Rs.10,000/- against private respondent no.2. Respondent no.2 be served through the concerned police station. Registry is directed to call for the record and proceedings of the case from the concerned Court.

(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) KAUSHIK J. RATHOD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter