Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6985 Guj
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2022
C/SCA/18508/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 04/08/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18508 of 2021
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
==========================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India or any order made thereunder ?
==========================================================
KALUBHAI LEBABHAI MALIVAD
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR CHINTAN N DESAI(9940) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR SOAHAM JOSHI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 04/08/2022
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Soaham Joshi, learned
Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of
Rule for the respondents in both these petitions.
2. With the consent of the learned advocates for the
respective parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing
C/SCA/18508/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 04/08/2022
today.
3. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the
benefits of GR dated 17.10.1988 read with GR 15.9.2014
and also for the benefits of the 7 th pay commission
consequential to the prayers of extension of the benefits of
the GRs as aforesaid.
4. Mr. Desai, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit
that the petitioner has been in service since 1989. It is not
in dispute that the petitioner is entitled to the benefits of
the GR dated 17.10.1988 read with Resolution of
15.9.2014. Reliance is placed on the decision dated
21.6.2019 of the coordinate bench of this Court passed in
SCA No.16084 of 2018 and allied matters and Division
Bench decision dated 28.2.2012 passed in LPA
No.1754/2011 and allied matters.
5. In context of the prayers made by the petitioner therefore
in light of the judgment dated 15.2.2019 passed in Civil
Appeal Nos.1684-1686 of 2019 of the Hon'ble Supreme
C/SCA/18508/2021 JUDGMENT DATED: 04/08/2022
Court in the case of State of Gujarat v. PWD & Forest
Employees Union, the case of the petitioner for extending
the benefits of the Resolutions dated 17.10.1988 and
15.9.2014 shall be considered and the benefits shall so be
granted within a period of twelve weeks from the date of
receipt of this order. Liberty to revive this petition with
regard to leave encashment if need arises pursuant to
the final decision of the Apex Court in the pending SLP.
6. It is needless to say as and when the petitioner
superannuates, the pensionary benefits shall be considered
in light of the decision in the case of Executive
Engineer Panchayat (MAA & M) Department and
another Versus Samudabhai Jyotibhai Bhedi and
others, reported in 2017(4) GLR 2952.
7. The petition is allowed in above terms. Rule is made
absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct Service is
permitted. No order as to costs.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) VATSAL S. KOTECHA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!