Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dhirubhai Dahabhai Patgir vs State Of Gujarat
2022 Latest Caselaw 6826 Guj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6826 Guj
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2022

Gujarat High Court
Dhirubhai Dahabhai Patgir vs State Of Gujarat on 1 August, 2022
Bench: Biren Vaishnav
     C/SCA/16171/2019                            JUDGMENT DATED: 01/08/2022




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

               R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16171 of 2019

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
================================================================
1     Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
      to see the judgment ?

2     To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

3     Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
      of the judgment ?

4     Whether this case involves a substantial question
      of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
      of India or any order made thereunder ?

================================================================
                        DHIRUBHAI DAHABHAI PATGIR
                                  Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
MR PRATIK Y JASANI(5325) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR UTKARSH SHARMA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
================================================================

     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV

                             Date : 01/08/2022

                             ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, learned

Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice

of Rule for the respondents.

C/SCA/16171/2019 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/08/2022

2. With the consent of the learned advocates for the

respective parties, the petition is taken up for final

hearing today.

3. By way of this petition, under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to grant

the benefit of continuity of service from 31.1.1990 to

31.3.2003 and he further prayed that his

representation dated 27.3.2019 be decided.

4. The facts in brief would indicate that the petitioner was

engaged as a Daily Wager with the respondents from

1.2.1982. The petitioner was discontinued from service

in the year 1990 and, therefore he had approached the

Labour Court by filing Reference (L.C.H.) No.131 of

1995. By an award dated 23.11.2000, the Labour

Court, Surendranagar held that the order of

termination from March, 1990 was bad and, therefore,

directed reinstatement with 20% back wages for the

C/SCA/16171/2019 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/08/2022

period from 24.5.1995. The State challenged the award

of the Labour Court by filing Special Civil Application

No.8593 of 2001. By an order dated 18.9.2003, the

award of the Labour Court of 23.11.2000 was set aside.

However, the petitioner was asked to be reinstated in

service and the Labour Court was directed to decide

the issue afresh.

5. Mr. Pratik Jasani, learned counsel for the petitioner

would rely upon the charts produced at Annexture `D'

indicating that right from the year 1982 till the year

2016, except when the petitioner was out of service

during the pendency of the Reference, he had

completed 240 days in each year of service.

6. What appears on record is that by an order dated

31.3.2015, the petitioner was granted the benefits of

Resolution dated 17.10.1988 based on the Resolution

dated 15.9.2014 in light of the decision of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of State of Gujarat Vs.

C/SCA/16171/2019 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/08/2022

PWD & Forest Employees Union reported in 2019 (15)

SCC 248 by treating the service from 29.10.2010 as

service for the purposes having completed 240 days for

each year. The record and the order indicates that

undisputedly the petitioner had served as a Daily Wager

from 1.2.1982. Based on the tabular form produced by the

learned counsel for the petitioner at Annexture `D'

together with the fact that, but for the Labour Court's

award being set aside and sent back for adjudication, there

was award directing reinstatement.

7. In light of these observations, the case of the petitioner be

considered and his representation dated 27.3.2019

pending before the respondent authorities be decided

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of

copy of this order.

8. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct Service is

permitted. No costs.

(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) VATSAL S. KOTECHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter