Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15026 Guj
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2021
C/LPA/137/2020 ORDER DATED: 24/09/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 137 of 2020
In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22318 of 2019
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR INTERIM RELIEF) NO. 1 of 2019
In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 137 of 2020
==========================================================
GUNVANTBHAI HIRABHAI MIYATRA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MAULIK SONI, ADVOCATE FOR MR NK MAJMUDAR(430) for the
Appellant(s) No. 1
MR. DHAWAN JAYSWAL, AGP, for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.
JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 24/09/2021
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA)
1 Heard Mr.Maulik Soni, learned advocate for Mr.N.K.Majmudar,
learned advocate for the appellant and Mr.Dhawan Jayswal, learned
Assistant Government Pleader for the State Authorities on advance copy.
2 Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order
dated 17.12.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge (Coram: Hon'ble
Mr.Justice Vipul M Pancholi) in Special Civil Application No. 22318 of
2019, the original petitioner has preferred this appeal under Clause 15 of
C/LPA/137/2020 ORDER DATED: 24/09/2021
the Letters Patent.
3 At the outset, it deserves to be noted that by the present writ
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the appellant -
original petitioner had prayed for a writ of mandamus or any other
appropriate writ and direction directing the respondent No.1 to initiate an
inquiry against the concerned members of the Panchayat who had passed
Resolution No.5 dated 18.09.2015 under which the land situated at
village-Mitedi, Ta: Manavadar, District : Junagadh came to be given on
rent to one Ramjibhai Trikambhai Kordiya Patel, Mitdi and
Purushottamlal ji Gaushala Trust. Other anciliary prayers were also
prayed for in the writ petition. The learned Single Judge after considering
the submissions made, considered the fact that the Taluka Development
Officer has already informed the District Development Officer to initiate
proceedings and came to the conclusion that no direction is required to be
issued and dismissed the petition.
4 As on date, one more reason has occurred i.e. the term of the
panchayat has already been over, therefore, the issue involved in the writ
petition has become academic. Even otherwise on merits, we do not find
that any further directions can be given.
C/LPA/137/2020 ORDER DATED: 24/09/2021 5 Mr.Maulik Soni, learned advocate appearing for the appellant
could not make out any further case and has not raise any further
contentions or grounds before us. In light of the aforesaid, the appeal fails
and is hereby dismissed. There shall be no orders as to costs. As the
appeal is dismissed, the connected civil application also stands disposed
of.
(THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA, J)
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) Bimal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!