Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manisha Sharma vs Competent Authority And Special ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 14795 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14795 Guj
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Manisha Sharma vs Competent Authority And Special ... on 22 September, 2021
Bench: Biren Vaishnav
    C/SCA/13612/2021                                      ORDER DATED: 22/09/2021



           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

            R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13612 of 2021
==========================================================
                   MANISHA SHARMA
                        Versus
COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ROHAN SHAH(7497) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR MEET THAKKAR, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP(99) for
the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR MAULIK G NANAVATI for NANAVATI & CO.(7105) for the Respondent(s)
No. 2
MR DEVANG VYAS, ASG for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.
         JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
         and
         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
                      Date : 22/09/2021
                       ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA)

1. Heard Mr. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Meet Thakkar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1, Mr. Maulik G. Nanavati, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Mr. Devang Vyas, learned ASG for respondent no.3.

2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-

"A. Be pleased to direct the respondent Competent Authority and Special Land Acquisition Officer and the respondent National Highway Authority of India, in light of the ratio laid down by this Hon'ble Court in judgement and order dated 12.09.2019 passed in SCA No.8734 of

C/SCA/13612/2021 ORDER DATED: 22/09/2021

2019 and confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 07.01.2021 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.18777 of 2020, to apply multiplying factor 2.00 instead of 1.00 and thereby, recalculate the compensation and be further pleased to direct the respondent Competnt Authority and Special Land Acquisition Officer and the respondent National Highway Authority of India to award the recalculated compensation within a period of three months from the date of the order;

B. Be pleased to direct the respondents to recompute the compensation qua the land of the petitioner by multiplying the market value as determined under Section 26(1) of the Act of 2013 with Factor 2 as per Section 26(2) and applying all other statutory benefits including solatium under Section 30(1), interest under Section 30(3) of the Act of 2013 and determine and pay such compensation with interest as per the ratio laid down by this Hon'ble High Court in judgement and order dated 12.09.2019 passed in SCA No.8734 of 2019 and confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 07.01.2021 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.18777 of 2020;

C. hold and declare and/or clarify that, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, since the rightful compensation which sh have been granted earlier is being granted at such a belated stage owing to no fault of the petitioner, hence, the statutory interest under Section 30(3) of the Act of 2013, will have to be paid from the date of the preliminary notification till the date of the passing of the fresh award;"

C/SCA/13612/2021 ORDER DATED: 22/09/2021

3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the issue involved in this petition is identical to the issue decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Shah Rajesh Manibhai Vs. National Highway Authority of India rendered in Special Civil Application no.5913 of 2021 dated 23.4.2021 as well as in the case of Dilipbhai Ganpatbhai Parmar Vs. Competent Authority rendered in Special Civil Application no.12140 of 2021 dated 27.8.2021. It was therefore submitted that this petition also be disposed of following the order passed in Special Civil Application no.5913 of 2021 dated 23.4.2021. The petitioner is agriculturist and was holding agricultural land bearing block no. 450, admeasuring 7892 sq. mtrs., situated at Village Samilaya, Taluka District Vadodara which is acquired for the public purpose of Vadodara-Mumbai Expressway.

4. The Coordinate Bench in the order dated 23.4.2021 passed in Special Civil Application no.5913 of 2021, while deciding the identical question of factor, has observed in Paragraph 7 of the said judgment as under:-

"7. Having, thus, heard, learned Advocates on both the sides and considering the rival submissions so also noticing the agreement on the part of the petitioners for this matter being referred to the competent authority for re-computation of the compensation, without dealing with the submissions of exclusivity of competent authority for

C/SCA/13612/2021 ORDER DATED: 22/09/2021

determination of compensation and keeping the same open, to be decided in an appropriate matter, we deem it appropriate to DIRECT the competent authority to re-compute the market value of the land of the petitioners herein, by applying the appropriate multiplication factor for the amount of compensation and follow the dictum of the Apex Court in all respects. We reiterate that while so doing, it shall BEAR IN MIND the decision of the Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Diary No. 18777 of 2020 so also the decision of this Court in SCA No. 8734 of 2019 and publish the corrected award under Section 3-G(1) of the Act.

7.1 This shall be done within the period of EIGHT WEEKS, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

5. Mr. Maulik G. Nanavati, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 submitted that in the instant case also, the petitioner has approached the arbitrator. Mr. Nanavati further submitted that as in the other cases in case of the present petitioner also, if it is found that the petitioner is entitled to Factor "2" being applied for determination of his compensation and other benefits, respondent no.2 authority shall make deposit within 21 days of such determination.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner candidly submitted that in view of the present order, the petitioner shall not insist for Factor "2" before the arbitrator as this Court has taken a similar view on the aspect of Factor "2".

C/SCA/13612/2021 ORDER DATED: 22/09/2021

7. Thus, following the decision of the Coordinate Bench rendered in Special Civil Application no.5913 of 2021 dated 23.4.2021 as well as the decision rendered in Special Civil Application no.12140 of 2021 dated 27.8.2021, the present petition is disposed of with same directions and terms as contained in the order dated 23.4.2021 passed in Special Civil Application no.5913 of 2021. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

(THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA, J)

(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) Maulik

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter