Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14384 Guj
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2021
C/CA/973/2020 ORDER DATED: 17/09/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 973 of 2020
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 42676 of 2019
==========================================================
HAMIDULLA ABDULGAFAR SAIYED (PATHAN)
Versus
DAYANESHWAR NARSINGRAO DUGA (MARATHA) (DELETED)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MAKBUL I MANSURI(2694) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR TANMAY B KARIA(6833) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
RULE NOT RECD BACK(63) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 17/09/2021
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned advocate for the applicant and
learned advocates for the respondent. The presence of
respondent No.2, is not required for the purpose of
disposal of present application.
The present application under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act is preferred to condone the delay which is
occurred in preferring First Appeal to assail the
impugned judgment and award.
Considering the averments made in this application,
the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Rule is made absolute.
(A.G.URAIZEE, J) SURESH SOLANKI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!