Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14261 Guj
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2021
C/CA/2957/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/09/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2957 of 2019
In
F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 26837 of 2019
================================================================
KAMLESHKUMAR PRANLAL PANDYA
Versus
PARBATBHAI LAKHABHAI GARCHAT
================================================================
Appearance:
NISHIT A BHALODI(9597) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KV GADHIA(319) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Respondent(s) No. 4
RULE NOT RECD BACK(63) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE UNSERVED(68) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 16/09/2021
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned advocate for the respondent Nos2 and 2 - Insurance Company.
Presence of respondent Nos 1 and 3 who happened to be the owner of the offending vehicle is not necessary for disposal of the present application.
Present application is preferred for condonation of delay which has occurred in preferring the appeal to assail the judgment award of the tribunal.
Considering the averments made in the application, the delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute.
(A.G.URAIZEE, J)
Manoj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!