Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13738 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2021
C/CA/464/2020 ORDER DATED: 09/09/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 464 of 2020
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 40042 of 2019
==========================================================
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
Versus
MANJULABEN RAJESHBHAI VASAVA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MAULIK J SHELAT(2500) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3
UNSERVED EXPIRED (R)(69) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 09/09/2021
ORAL ORDER
Heard Mr. Shelat, learned advocate for the
applicant. Despite service of notice of rule, there is no
appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 3.
Mr. Shelat, learned advocate for the applicant seeks
permission to delete respondent No.2 who happens to be
driver of the offending vehicle.
Permission as prayed for is granted.
The respondent No. 5 stands deleted from the array
of the respondents.
Present application is preferred for condonation of
delay which has occurred in preferring appeal to
C/CA/464/2020 ORDER DATED: 09/09/2021
challenge the impugned judgment and award passed by
the Tribunal.
Considering the averments made in the application
and the facts of the case, delay is hereby condoned. The
application stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute to
the aforesaid extent.
(A.G.URAIZEE, J) SURESH SOLANKI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!