Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13737 Guj
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2021
C/CA/4659/2019 ORDER DATED: 09/09/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4659 of 2019
In
F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 35499 of 2019
==========================================================
PRAJAPATI VITTHALBHAI KHEMABHAI
Versus
FATESINH BHARATBHAI DAMOR
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR.HIREN M MODI(3732) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR NISHITH P THAKKAR(2836) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Respondent(s) No. 4
MS ASHA D TIWARI(2983) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
RULE UNSERVED(68) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 09/09/2021
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned advocate for the applicant. The
respondent No.3 seems to be the owner of one of the
offending vehicles is not served. However, for the
purpose of disposal of the present application, his
presence is not required.
Present application is preferred for condonation of
delay which has occurred in preferring appeal to
challenge the impugned judgment and award passed by
the Tribunal.
Considering the averments made in the application
and the facts of the case, delay is hereby condoned. The
C/CA/4659/2019 ORDER DATED: 09/09/2021
application is allowed. Rule is made absolute to the
aforesaid extent.
(A.G.URAIZEE, J) SURESH SOLANKI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!