Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4968 Guj
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2021
R/CR.MA/5207/2021 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 5207 of 2021
================================================================
CHINTAN JAYANTBHAI SHAH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
MR YN OZA WITH MS SRUSHTI A THULA(5014) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A. P. THAKER
Date : 31/03/2021
ORAL ORDER
Heard Mr.Y. N. Oza, learned arguing counsel for Ms.Srushti Thula, learned advocate for the petitioner through video conferencing.
Mr.Y. N. Oza, learned arguing counsel has submitted that there is no such power lies with the police authority under Sections 107 and 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code, when the matter is regarding the civil transaction. According to him, the entire exercise carried out by the police authority vide page Nos.13 and 14 is without jurisdiction and, therefore, he has submitted that while admitting the petition, the interim relief in terms of para-13(C) may be granted. He has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah Vs. State of Gujarat and another rendered in Criminal Appeal No.9 of 2019 dated 03.01.2019.
Hence, RULE returnable on 18.06.2021. In the meanwhile, ad-interim relief in terms of para-13(C) is granted. Direct service is permitted.
(DR. A. P. THAKER, J) V.R. PANCHAL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!