Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3675 Guj
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2021
C/FA/943/2021 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 943 of 2021
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 944 of 2021
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 945 of 2021
===================================
LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION OFFICER
Versus
KOLI CHAMNAJI SURAJI
===================================
Appearance:
MR BHARAT VYAS, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1) for
the Appellant(s) No. 1,2
MR JINESH H KAPADIA(5601) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
MR TUSHAR CHAUDHARY(5316) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
===================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH A. TRIVEDI
Date : 02/03/2021
ORAL ORDER
Heard Shri Bharat Vyas, learned Assistant Government Pleader, for the appellants. He has pointed out that the sale index of village Lakhani, which is relied by the learned Judge, is no way comparable for determining the market value of the land situated at village Manpura, lands of which is acquired in the present acquisition proceedings. He has further submitted that as observed by the learned Judge in the judgment and award in between village Lakhani and village Manpura, there is another village Vasana Vatam, and therefore, market value of the lands acquired in the present acquisition proceedings could not have been awarded any compensation based on sale index for commercial and /or non
C/FA/943/2021 ORDER
commercial lands of village Lakhani. Hence, ADMIT. Shri Tushar Chaudhary, learned advocate, waives service of notice of admission on behalf of the respondents - original claimants.
(UMESH A. TRIVEDI, J.)
siji
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!