Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Niraj Kripalsinh Bishan vs State Of Gujarat
2021 Latest Caselaw 3549 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3549 Guj
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Niraj Kripalsinh Bishan vs State Of Gujarat on 26 February, 2021
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
               R/CR.MA/11804/2020                             ORDER




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 11804 of 2020

============================================
                    NIRAJ KRIPALSINH BISHAN
                              Versus
                       STATE OF GUJARAT
============================================
Appearance:
MR NIRAV C SANGHAVI(5950) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MAHESH K POOJARA(5879) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS MD MEHTA ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
============================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                    Date : 26/02/2021

                                     ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Advocate Shri Nirav C. Sanghavi for the applicant, learned APP Ms. M.D. Mehta for the respondent No.1 State and learned Advocate Mr. Mahesh Pujara for the respondent No.2 - original complainant.

2. By way of this application, the applicant prays for quashing of the complaint being C.R. No. I - 48 of 2016 registered with Thorala Police Station, Dist. Rajkot Ctiy for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and 144 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act as well as all the consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR.

3. Learned Advocate Shri Sanghavi submits that pursuant to the filing of the application, applicant and the prosecutrix got married after the prosecutrix had attained the age of majority. He further submits that out of

R/CR.MA/11804/2020 ORDER

the wedlock of applicant and prosecutrix, a child has been born. He further submits that considering the fact that the parties have settled the dispute inter se, no fruitful purpose would be served, if the complaint impugned and the proceedings arising out of the same are not quashed.

4. Learned Advocate Shri Pujara upon joining the meeting requests for permission to join the complainant - Navalbhai Kishorbhai Mali, who is present in the office of learned Advocate Shri C.D. Sankaliya and upon joining the meeting, said complainant is identified by learned Advocate Shri Pujara and upon inquiry by this Court, the complaint confirms that the matter has been settled between the parties and he would not have any objection, if the complaint as well as Criminal Case are quashed against the applicant. Learned Advocate submits that the complainant has already filed an affidavit to this regard, which is at page 32 of the application.

5. Learned APP Ms. M.D. Mehta strongly opposed the quashing of the complaint and she further submits that the offences committed by the applicants are serious in nature and therefore, no indulgence may be shown.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the parties and considering the fact that the dispute between the parties was private in nature i.e. matrimonial and the fact that the applicant and the prosecutrix got married and there is a child out of said wedlock and also considering the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. , reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab , reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors. , reported in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC) , this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served, if the complaint is proceeded any further.

R/CR.MA/11804/2020 ORDER

7. In view of the discussions and observations above, the criminal complaint being C.R. No. I - 48 of 2016 registered with Thorala Police Station, Dist. Rajkot Ctiy for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and 144 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act as well as the proceedings arising out of said FIR being Special POSCO Case No.77 of 2020 pending before the Court of 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot, are hereby quashed qua the applicants.

Rule is made absolute. Registry is directed to communicate this order to the concerned Police Station through Email immediately.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) Y.N. VYAS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter