Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3304 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2021
C/SCA/3777/2021 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3777 of 2021
==========================================================
SANJAYSINH AMIRSINH BARAD
Versus
HEMANTBHAI KANUBHAI CHAUHAN
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR YV BRAHMBHATT(206) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6
for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI
Date : 25/02/2021
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned advocate Mr. YV Brahmbhatt for the petitioner through video conference.
He has submitted that in the present case the right to file written statement of the petitioner(original defendant) were closed and the matter was proceeded further of which, is not legal and proper, since as per the judgment laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/S R.N. Jadi and Brothers & Ors. Vs. Subhaschandra reported in AIR 2007 SC 2571, the provision does not deal with the power of the Court and also does not specifically take away the power of the Court to take the written statements on record though filed beyond the time as provided for. Further, the nature of the provision contained in Order 8 Rule 10 is procedural.
The matter requires consideration.
Issue, NOTICE for final disposal making it returnable on 20.04.2021, subject to stand taken by the respondents and convenience.
(A. C. JOSHI,J) Radhika
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!