Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vireshkumar Hargovandas Patel vs The Regional Passport Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 1543 Guj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1543 Guj
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021

Gujarat High Court
Vireshkumar Hargovandas Patel vs The Regional Passport Officer on 2 February, 2021
Bench: Vipul M. Pancholi
         C/SCA/5947/2020                                              ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5947 of 2020
==========================================================
             VIRESHKUMAR HARGOVANDAS PATEL
                            Versus
              THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ARPIT P PATEL(5497) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR KSHITIJ M AMIN (7572), CENTRAL GOVERNMENT STANDING
COUNSEL for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
                    Date : 02/02/2021
                     ORAL ORDER

1. The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to direct the respondent - Regional Passport Officer to reconsider application No.AH2072149873418 for reissuance of the passport to the petitioner.

2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Arpit P. Patel for the petitioner and learned Central Government Standing Counsel Mr.Kshitij Amin for the respondent.

3. Learned advocate for the petitioner has referred the averments made in this petition and, thereafter, submitted that one FIR was lodged against the petitioner in the year 2007. However, after a conclusion of trial, the petitioner has been acquitted by the competent Criminal Court vide judgment and order dated 26.07.2012. Against the said order of acquittal, the State of Gujarat has

C/SCA/5947/2020 ORDER

preferred an acquittal appeal being Criminal Appeal No.1667 of 2012 before this Court. The said acquittal appeal is still pending for final hearing. It is submitted that the petitioner submitted an application for reissuance of passport on 22.03.2018 along with the requisite details and fees. It is submitted that the said application was not considered by the respondent on the ground that acquittal appeal filed by the State of Gujarat is pending before this Court. At this stage, learned advocate for the petitioner has placed reliance upon order dated 19.01.2017 passed by this Court in Special Criminal Application No.418 of 2017 as well as the order dated 20.02.2019 passed in Special Civil Application No.20709 of 2018. After referring to the same, it is submitted that in the order dated 19.01.2017, this Court has considered the Notification dated 25.08.1993 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs. It is submitted after considering the said Notification, this Court directed the respondent authority to issue the passport to the concerned petitioner for a period of 5 years. It is submitted that relying upon the said order, this Court has also considered the case of the concerned petitioner in Special Civil Application No.20709 of 2018 and similar direction was issued to the respondent authority.

3.1 Learned advocate for the petitioner has, therefore, urged that appropriate direction be issued to the respondent to reissue the passport of the

C/SCA/5947/2020 ORDER

petitioner for a particular period.

4. On the other hand, learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that as the Criminal Appeal filed by the State of Gujarat is pending against the order of acquittal passed by the concerned trial Court in the case of the petitioner, the respondent authority has not issued the passport to the petitioner. He has also referred the Notification dated 25.08.1993 issued by the concerned ministry. He is not in a position to dispute the fact that in similar type of cases, this Court has passed the order directing the respondent authority to issue the passport for a particular period to the concerned persons.

5. Having heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and having gone through the material placed on record and after considering the Notification dated 25.08.1993 which is referred in the order dated 19.01.2017 passed in Special Criminal Application No.418 of 2017, the case of the petitioner is required to be considered.

6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent authority to consider the case of the petitioner for issuance of passport. The respondent authority is directed to process the application and, thereafter, issue the passport for a validity period of five years in terms of the Notification dated 25.08.1993. The respondent

C/SCA/5947/2020 ORDER

shall complete the exercise within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Direct Service is permitted.

(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J) piyush

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter