Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10826 Guj
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021
C/LPA/842/2020 ORDER DATED: 05/08/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 842 of 2020
In
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5162 of 2015
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2020
In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 842 of 2020
With
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 843 of 2020
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5163 of 2015
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2020
In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 843 of 2020
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5163 of 2015
With
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 816 of 2020
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5161 of 2015
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2020
In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 816 of 2020
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5161 of 2015
With
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 835 of 2020
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5160 of 2015
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2020
In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 835 of 2020
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5160 of 2015
==========================================================
ASHABEN KADAKIYABHAI BHABHOR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MA PAREKH(1088) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
Respondent - State
RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI
Date : 05/08/2021
COMMON ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA)
C/LPA/842/2020 ORDER DATED: 05/08/2021
1. Heard Mr. Mahesh A. Parekh, learned advocate for the appellants and Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent - State in all the appeals.
2. Mr. Parekh has invited attention of this Court to the fact that in a similar case, a Coordinate Bench has already allowed the appeals filed by similarly situated persons. Mr. Parekh states that the issue involved in these appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of the Coordinate Bench in the case of Shaileshkumar Lalabhai Rajat Vs. The State of Gujarat, reported in 2021 (2) GLH 670. We have also gone through the said judgment. However, we find that in the original writ petitions before the learned Single Judge, so also in these intra-Court appeals, the appellants - original petitioners have not prayed for any regularization of service. Mr. Parekh states that the appellants do not claim any regularization and all that is prayed is grant of regular pay scale.
For orders.
(R.M.CHHAYA, J)
(NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) Maulik
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!