Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2504 Gua
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2026
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010143352025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3848/2025
TULAN KUMAR BORA AND 5 ORS.
SON OF- JOY RAM BORA. VILL- KAMPUR BRINDABAN NAGAR. DIST-
NAGAON, ASSAM.
2: BABUL BORA
SON OF- UPEN BORA VILL- KAMAPUR TUMPRANG PWD PATH. DIST-
NAGAON
ASSAM.
3: KHITAP CHANDRA MUDOI
SON OF-RAMA KANTA MUDOI. VILL- DAB NARIKALI MUGACHINGIA
PATH. DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM.
4: PRABHAT SAIKIA
SON OF- CHENIRAM SAIKIA. VILL- MUGA CHUNGIA
DAB NARIKALI. DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM.
5: APRIMA MOHAN
C/O- KUSHA KUMAR HAZARIKA
R/O- VILL-219 KAMPUR ROHA ROAD
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
6: NIROLA DEKA
CARE OF-DEBANARI KALI. VILL-DAB NARIKALI. DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, SCHOOL EDUCATION (SECONDARY DEPARTMENT), DISPUR,
Page No.# 2/3
GUWAHATI-6
2:THE DIRECTOR
SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19.
3:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
NAGAON DISTRICT CIRCLE
DISTRICT- NAGAON
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R BHUYAN, S LASKAR,MR S ABDULLAH,MR N A
MAZARBHUIYA,MR N Z CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU.,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
ORDER
Date : 19-03-2026
Heard Mr. AR Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. P Das, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education Department.
By this application, the petitioners contend that they being the Graduate Teachers are entitled to Grade Pay of Rs.8,700/- per month, whereas by way of a Notification issued by the Inspector of Schools, their Grade Pay was reduced from Rs.8,700/- to Rs.6,800/- in view of the order given in another analogous Writ Appeals.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the appellants in the said Writ Appeals were under Graduates and were not given Grade Pay but in the instant case, all the petitioners are Graduates and as such, they will not be affected by the Notification issued by the Inspector of Schools neither by the Page No.# 3/3
order of the Hon'ble High Court.
The respondent No. 2 has filed an affidavit-in-opposition stating that the petitioners are all under Graduates during their entry into the service to which Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners differs and as such he submits that he would like to file a rejoinder to the said affidavit-in-opposition bringing into record that the petitioners were all Graduates during their entry into service.
Prayer is allowed.
List the matter again on 22.04.2026.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!