Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2244 Gua
Judgement Date : 14 March, 2026
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010003732017
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MACApp./373/2022
THE SRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
1000-E/8 RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPURA, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN 302022
AND HAVING A BRANCH OFFICE AT B. R. ARCADE, 3RD FLOOR, 21
JANAPATH, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI 781007 REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL
OFFICER
VERSUS
SMTI MINAKSHI BARUAH and 4 ORS
W/O LATE MUKUNDA MADHAB BARUAH
2:KAUTILYA DARSHAN BARUAH
S/O LATE MUKUNDA MADHAB BARUAH
3:SMTI NIRA BARUAH
W/O LATE PRABHAT CH. BARUAH
ALL ARE R/O VILL. AMGAON
NANDAN PATH
NARENGI
P.S. NOONMATI
GUWAHATI 781026
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM PRESENTLY R/O C/O SRI ARUN CH. DEKA
NOONMATI
HOUSE NO. 50
SANKAR NAGAR
P.O. and P.S. NOONMATI
GUWAHATI 781020
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM. RESPONDENT NO. 2 BEING MINOR IS REPRESENTED BY HIS
Page No.# 2/3
LEGAL GUARDIAN MOTHER I.E. RESPONDENT NO. 1
4:MD. RAHIJUDDIN ALI @ RAHIJULUDDIN ALI
S/O LATE JOWAUDDIN ALI @ JOWAN UDDIN
R/O VILL. 1 NO. BAMUNBARI
P.S. BOKO
DIST. KAMRUP R
ASSAM
PINCODE 781123 PRESENT ADDRESS SATGAON
TALTOLABASTI
P.S. SATGAON
GUWAHATI 781027
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM.
5:SHUSHIL ROY
S/O SOILEN CH. ROY
C/O HARENDRA NATH BORA
TANGLA SATRA PATH
BYE LANE NO. 2 H/N 3
JAYANAGAR
GUWAHATI 781022
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R GOSWAMI, MS.M SAIKIA,MS.P BORTHAKUR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR K BARMAN, MR.R BARUAH(R- 1-3),MR.A BHARALI (R- 1-
3),MR.S K SINGHA(R- 1-3)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER
14.03.2026
Ms. Minakshi Baruah/claimant No. 1, is present today. The claimant No.
2/Mr. Kautilya Darshan Baruah, aged about 19 years could not be present today Page No.# 3/3
due to educational responsibilities. Mr. Rahijuluddin Ali representing Shriram
General Insurance Co. Ltd. along with Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the
appellant.
It is submitted that the claimant No. 3 has, in the meantime, expired. Ms.
Minakshi Baruah has submitted that the claimant No. 2, i.e. her son, is also
agreeable to the settlement.
In the absence of the claimant No. 2, the settlement could not be finalized
today. Since the parties have consented, list this matter again on 23.03.2026
before the regular Court.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!