Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lal Badsha Baniya Alias Lal Badsa Baniya vs The State Of Assam
2025 Latest Caselaw 9002 Gua

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9002 Gua
Judgement Date : 28 November, 2025

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Lal Badsha Baniya Alias Lal Badsa Baniya vs The State Of Assam on 28 November, 2025

                                                                          Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010215352025




                                                                   undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                  Case No. : AB/2341/2025

            LAL BADSHA BANIYA ALIAS LAL BADSA BANIYA
            S/O LATE SABED ALI BANIYA
            R/O VILL- GAJIPARA (GORAIMARI), P.O. GORAIMARI, P.S. BONGAIGAON,
            DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM
            PIN-783390



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM
            REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM.



Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. N J DUTTA, MR. B HUSSAIN,MR. A A MONDAL

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,




                                    BEFORE
                        HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

                                           ORDER

28.11.2025

Heard Mr. N. J. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

2. This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed by the petitioner, Page No.# 2/4

namely, Lal Badsha Baniya @ Lal Badsa Baniya, apprehending arrest in connection with Manikpur PS Case No. 76/2025 registered under Section 20(b)/21(b)/29 of NDPS Act. Corresponding to GR No. 316/2025.

3. The allegation in the FIR date 03.07.2025 is that on the basis of an information, the police searched the house of one Samirul Baniya and thereafter, the common premises of brothers Lal Badsha Baniya and Lal Miya Baniya were searched and upon such search, 12.30 kg of opium/poppy seeds (crushed) were seized which was kept in jute bag. Upon being information given by the said Samirul Baniya, the house of Lal Badsha Baniya was also searched and there one Yusuf Ali was found and from his pocket 50.33 grams of opium was seized.

4. With regard to poppy seeds, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same is not covered by the provisions of the NDPS Act and the said position was also been clarified by case law.

5. In this regard the reference has been made to the judgment in the State of Himachal Pradesh vs Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo and others reported in 2022 Supreme (SC) and 1081 relevant paragraph 26 is reproduced herein below:

"26. In the present case, we are concerned with the conviction in relation to 'poppy straw'. 'Poppy straw has been defined to mean all parts of opium poppy after harvesting, whether in their original form or cut, crushed or powdered and whether or not juice has been extracted therefrom. However, the said definition excludes the seeds. As such, 'poppy straw' would mean all parts of 'opium poppy' except the seeds. Therefore, for bringing home the guilt of the accused for contravention in relation to 'poppy straw', it will be relevant to refer to the definition of 'opium poppy'. 'Opium poppy' Page No.# 3/4

has been defined under Clause (xvii) of Section 2 of the 1985 Act which has been reproduced hereinabove. As per sub-clause (a) of Clause (xvii) of Section 2 of the 1985 Act, 'opium poppy' means the plant of the species 'papaver somniferum L'. As per sub-clause (b) thereof, 'opium poppy' would also mean the plant of any other species of 'papaver' from which 'opium' or any 'phenanthrene alkaloid' can be extracted and which the Central Government, by notification in the official gazette, has declared to be 'opium poppy' for the purposes of the 1985 Act."

(emphasis supplied)

6. With regard to the opium, prima facie it appears that as per the FIR it was recovered from the pocket of one Yusuf Ali.

7. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that if bail is considered then perhaps only interim bail may be given at present as FSL report is awaited.

8. I find force in the said contention.

9. Accordingly, send back the case diary to be procured again along with the FSL report.

10. In the meantime, the petitioner named above, shall be released on interim pre-arrest bail, in connection with the above noted case, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 30,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject, of course, to the following conditions that the petitioner:

(a) shall co-operate with the investigation and make himself available for examination;

(b) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence of the case. (C) not indulge in any illegal activity prohibited by the NDPS Act.

Page No.# 4/4

11. List the matter 16.12.2025.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter