Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 646 Gua
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010127122023
2025:GAU-AS:6109
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2164/2023
SADHU SAIKIA
S/O LATE PRAHLAD SAIKIA,
R/O MACHARHAT, JB ROAD, DIST.- JORHAT, ASSAM.
VERSUS
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (FCI) AND 3 ORS.
REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, ULUBARI,
GUWAHATI.
2:THE GENERAL MANAGER
FCI
REGIONAL OFFICE
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI.
3:THE DISTRICT MANAGER (AM)
FCI
DISTRICT OFFICE
JORHAT.
4:THE AREA MANAGER
FCI
JORHAT
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. JYOTIRMOY ROY, MS E NATH,MR. C
CHAKRAVARTY,MR. R HAZARIKA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR B K SINGH,
Page No.# 2/3
Linked Case :
SADHU SAIKIA
VERSUS
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (FCI) AND 3 ORS. H
------------
Advocate for : MR. R HAZARIKA
Advocate for : appearing for FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (FCI) AND 3 ORS.
H
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER
16.05.2025
1. Heard learned counsel Mr. B. P. Sharma on behalf of learned counsel Mr. R. Hazarika representing the respondent.
2. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with prayer for condonation of delay of 115 days in preferring the connected appeal. The applicant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29.10.2022, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Jorhat in Money Suit No. 02/2020.
3. It is submitted that after the judgment and decree, the applicant was advised over mobile phone to prefer an appeal before the Gauhati High Court and he was requested to collect the judgment from the office. Thereafter, the Page No.# 3/3
applicant collected the copies of the judgment and decree and acted upon the advice of the engaged counsel whom he consulted on 11.12.2022. After consultation with the family members, the applicant decided to prefer this appeal. The delay was owing to the winter vacation followed by the bihu vacation of this Court from 23.12.2022 and 16.01.2023, and thereafter on 20.01.2023, the applicant consulted with the engaged counsel stationed at Guwahati.
4. It is submitted that the delay was not intentional. There is every possibility that the appeal may succeed. The applicant has shown sufficient grounds.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the respondent.
6. I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection. The delay of 115 days is thereby condoned.
7. Registry to register the connected appeal.
8. In terms of the above observation, this I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!