Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5374 Gua
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010056742025
2025:GAU-AS:7904
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1057/2025
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT SHAW WALLACE
BUIDING NEW NO. 319, OLD NO. 154, 2ND FLOOR, THAMBU CHETTY,
CHENNAI, PIN-6000001, INDIA, ITS ZONAL OFFICE AT OFFICE NO. 201 AND
202 L AND T CHAMBERS, 2ND FLOOR, 16 CAMAC STREET, KOLKATA-
700017 AND ITS GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR, AASTHA
PLAZA, BORA SERVICE, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM-
781007 REP BY THE DEPUTY LEGAL CLAIMS OF GUWAHATI REGIONAL
OFFICE,
VERSUS
REKHA BASFORE AND 5 ORS
W/O. LT. MADAN BASFORE
2:RAJESH BASFORE
LT. MADAN BASFORE
3:PUJA BASFORE
D/O. LT. MADAN BASFORE
ALL ARE R/O. QUARTER NO. 215-A
TYPE-II
NAMBARI
MALIGAON
P/S. JALUKBARI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-781014.
4:SANAMATI BASFORE
W/O. LT. MADAN BASFORE
5:ARJUN BASFORE
S/O. LT. MADAN BASFORE
Page No.# 2/3
BOTH ARE R/O. CYCLE FACTORY
FATASIL AMBARI
P/O. AND P/S. FATASIL AMBARI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-781025.
6:PAPPU KUMAR SHARMA
S/O. DINESH KR. SHARMA
R/O. SHARMA TYRE SERVICE
FATASIL AMBARI
P/O. AND P/S. FATASIL AMBARI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-78102
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T KALITA, MR. A KAKATI
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. M GAZLOO (R-1,2,3), MANJUSHREE PATGIRI (R-5),MR. A
CHOUDHURY(R-5),MS D D ROY(R-1,2,3)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
ORDER
16.06.2025
Heard Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T. Kalita, learned counsel for the applicant; Ms. M. Gazloo, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 1, 2 & 3; and Ms. M. Patgiri, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 4 & 5.
2. This application, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 173 of the M.V. Act, is preferred by the applicant for condoning the delay of 50 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and order dated 23.10.2024, passed by the learned Member, M.A.C.T. No. 2, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati, in MAC Case No. 2635/2016.
3. Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the applicant submits that there Page No.# 3/3
was delay in obtaining the certified copy of the impugned judgment and order and also there was delay in obtaining approval from the Head Office of the applicant company. Mr. Bhattacharjee further submits that the delay is circumstantial and not deliberate and the same has sufficiently been explained in paragraph Nos. 3 - 7 of this petition and therefore, it is contended to allow the same.
4. The learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that they have no objection in the event of condoning the delay.
5. Taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties also in view of the explanation so forthcoming for the delay, this court is of the view that the delay has sufficiently been explained in paragraph Nos. 3 - 7 of this petition and therefore, the same stands condoned.
6. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of.
7. Now, the registry shall register the connected appeal and list the same before the court as soon as practicable.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!