Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

2: Smti Tutu Hazarika vs The Union Of India And 6 Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 1107 Gua

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1107 Gua
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2025

Gauhati High Court

2: Smti Tutu Hazarika vs The Union Of India And 6 Ors on 17 July, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Medhi
                                                                 Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010214342015




                                                          undefined

                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/7322/2015

         ON THE DEATH OF RAMANI HAZARIKA THE FOLLOWING LEGAL HEIRS
         ARE TO BE SUBSTITUTED
         S/O LT. RAMESWAR HAZARIKA VILL- PHUKAN PHODIA P.O.
         GAURISAGAR, DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM.

         1.1: DULU HAZARIKA
         WIFE OF LATE RAMANI HAZARIKAORIGINALLY RESIDENT OF
         GAURISAGAR PHUKAN PHODIA GAON NEAR BISHNU DOL PO
         GAURISAGAR PS GAURISAGAR DIST SIVASAGAR ASSAM PRESENTLY
         RESIDING AT WARD NO 4 BOKAKHAT TOWN PO BOKAKHAT PS
         BOKAKHAT DIST GOLAGHAT PIN785612 ASSAM

         1.2: SMTI TUTU HAZARIKA
         ALIAS SMTI TUTU DUTTA AGED 33 YEARS D/O LATE RAMANI HAZARIKA
         AND W/O SRI RIPUL DUTTA RESIDENT OF POLAKHOWA VILLAGE
         BOKAKHAT PO AND PS BOKAKHAT DIST GOLAGHAT PIN 78561

         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA and 6 ORS
         REP. BY THE MINISTRY OF CULTURE GOVT. OF INDIA, SHASTRI BHAWAN,
         NEW DELHI- 110001.

         2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA
          DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS
          NEW DELHI
          SHASTRI BHAWAN
          NEW DELHI-110001.

         3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
         ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA
          JANAPATH
          NEW DELHI.
                                                                      Page No.# 2/4

            4:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ER
            ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA
             I BBD BAGH CURRENCY BUILDING
             KOLKATA.

            5:THE SUPERINTENDING ARCHAEOLOGIST
            ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA
             GUWAHATI CIRCLE
             GNB ROAD
            AMABARI
             GUWAHATI-1.

            6:THE STATE OF ASSAM

             REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
             REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
             GUWAHATI-6.

            7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

             SIVASAGAR
             ASSAM.

            8:SMTI SABITA HAZARIKA GOGOI
             DO LATE RAMANI HAZARIKA
            WIFE OF SRI PRANJU GOGOI
            RO WARD NO 4 OF BOKAKHAT TOWN PO AND PS BOKAKHAT SUB
            DIVISION BOKAKHAT PIN 785612 DIST-GOLAGHA

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR.H BURAGOHAIN, MR. A CHAMUAH,MS.M BORAH

Advocate for the Respondent : MS.P BARUA, MRS. A GAYAN,MR. R K D
CHOUDHURY,,ASSTT.S.G.I.,MS.R GOGOI,MR. S C KEYAL


            WP(C)/7235/2015

            RAJEN BAIRAGI
            S/O LT. BETHARAM BAIRAGI VILL- GAURISAGAR P.O. GAURISAGAR DIST.
            SIVASAGAR
            ASSAM PIN - 785664


             VERSUS

            THE UNION OF INDIA and 6 ORS
            REP. BY THE MINISTRY OF CULTURE GOVT. OF INDIA
                                                       Page No.# 3/4

SHASTRI BHAWAN
NEW DELHI-110001.

2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA

DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS
NEW DELHI
SHASTRI BHAWAN
NEW DELHI-110001.

3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA
JANAPATH
NEW DELHI.

4:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ER
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA
I BBD BAGH CURRENCY BUILDING
KOLKATA.

5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY
OF INDIA
GUWAHATI CIRCLE
GNB ROAD
AMBARI
GUWAHATI-1.

6:THE STATE OF ASSAM

REP. BY THE COMMISIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
GUWAHATI-6.

7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

SIVASAGAR
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR.H BURAGOHAIN
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA and 6 ORS
                                                                             Page No.# 4/4

                                 BEFORE
                HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

                                       ORDER

17.07.2025 Heard Shri H Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. A Gayan, learned Central Government Counsel (CGC).

While Shri Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon a judgment dated 02.07.1990 of this Court passed in CR No.939/1983, learned CGC has submitted that the judgment may not have an application inasmuch as, subsequent to the said judgment, a Gazette notification has been issued putting certain restrictions on constructions within a specified distance from the protected monument.

On the prayer of Ms. Gayan, learned CGC, the matter is adjourned by 2 weeks to enable her to produce the relevant records wherein, an assessment has been made that the construction in question is within the prohibited distance as per the Gazette notification.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter