Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/6 vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 3029 Gua

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3029 Gua
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2025

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/6 vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 11 February, 2025

                                                                     Page No.# 1/6

GAHC010131442023




                                                               2025:GAU-AS:1439-
DB

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
     (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WA/224/2023

            DILIP BAHADUR DHAMAI
            S/O- LT. BISHNU BAHADUR DHAMAI, R/O- COLLEGE ROAD, WARD NO.13,
            P.O. AND P.S. HAILAKANDI, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM

            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
            TO BE REP. BY COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HIGHER
            EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-06

            2:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
            ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19

            3:THE DY. DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
            ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19

            4:THE PRINCIPAL SRIKISHAN SARDA COLLEGE
             HAILAKANDI
             P.O. P.S. HAILAKANDI
             DIST.- HAILAKANDI
            ASSAM PIN- 788151

            5:THE GOVERNING BODY OF SRIKISHAN SARDA COLLEGE
             HAILAKANDI TO BE REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT C/O PRINCIPAL CUM
            SECRETARY S.S. COLLEGE
             P.O. HAILAKANDI
             P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI
            ASSAM PIN- 78815

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. H A TALUKDAR, MR. K MIRA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU,
                                                                   Page No.# 2/6

                               BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
              HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

                          Date of hearing : 11.02.2025
                    Date of Judgment & Order : 11.02.2025


                            JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)

(N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.)

Heard Mr. K. Mir, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. Also heard Mr. D. Upamanyu, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department, appearing on behalf of all the respondents.

2. The appellant, herein, by way of instituting the intra-Court appeal, has presented a challenge to an order, dated 25.01.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(c)311/2023.

3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issue arising in the present proceeding, is noticed as under:

The appellant, herein, who was working a Laboratory Bearer in Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, had initially approached the writ Court by way of instituting a writ petition being WP(c)2621/2017, praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities for consideration of his case for promotion to the cadre of Junior Assistant. The writ Court vide order, dated 24.01.2020, was pleased to dispose of the said writ petition, directing the authorities of Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, to consider the case of the appellant, herein, along with other eligible candidates, for promotion against the vacant post of Junior Assistant if the aforesaid post falls under Page No.# 3/6

promotional quota as per Rule. Thereafter, it is seen that the authorities of Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, had conducted a selection in the matter and the Departmental Promotion Committee(DPC) so constituted, had, in its meeting held on 20.02.2021, proceeded to recommend the case of the appellant, herein, for promotion against a post of Junior Assistant lying vacant in the said College.

The said recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee(DPC) of the Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, was approved by the Governing Body of the said College, in its meeting held on 18.03.2021, and accordingly, the matter was forwarded to the Director, Higher Education Department, Assam, for approval. The Director, Higher Education Department, Assam, upon consideration of the matter, vide communication, dated 15.12.2022, proceeded to reject the proposal so submitted by the College authorities for promotion of the appellant to the post of Junior Assistant on the ground that he did not possess the prescribed qualification for being considered for such promotion.

Being aggrieved, the appellant, herein, had approached the writ Court by way of instituting a writ petition being WP(c)311/2023. The learned Single Judge after considering the issue arising in the proceeding, was pleased vide order, dated 25.01.2023, to dismiss the said writ petition holding that the appellant not possessing the educational qualification as prescribed for being considered for promotion to the post of Group C in terms of the Guidelines as notified vide the Notification, dated 09.02.2017; the order, dated 15.12.2022, passed by the Director, Higher Education Department, Assam, would not call for any interference.

Page No.# 4/6

4. Mr. Mir, learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that the prescription of eligibility criteria in the Guidelines as notified vide the Notification, dated 09.02.2017, for the post of Junior Assistant in a provincialized College of the State, would not be mandated to be so applied in case of promotion to the post of Junior Assistant, in-as-much as, the said Guidelines as notified vide the Notification, dated 09.02.2017, would only be applicable in respect of direct recruitment to the post, in question.

5. Mr. Mir, learned counsel, has further submitted that the Assam College Employees(Provincialization) Rules, 2010, does not mandate any eligibility criteria requisite to be possessed for being considered for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant from the cadre of Laboratory Bearer/Library Bearer/ Grade-IV.

6. Mr. Mir, learned counsel for the appellant, has, however, not been able to highlight as to the eligibility criteria requisite to be mandated, to be possessed by an incumbent in the post of Laboratory Bearer/Library Bearer/Grade-IV for being considered for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant.

7. The materials brought on record in the instant writ appeal also contain a seniority list of the incumbents in the cadre of Grade-IV in Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, as on 02.08.2021. A perusal of the said seniority list would go to reveal that there are 3(three) more incumbents in the cadre of non-teaching staff who are senior to the appellant, herein. However, their cases have not been so considered for promotion to the next higher cadre.

Page No.# 5/6

8. In the event, the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that the Guidelines as notified vide the Notification, dated 09.02.2017, for recruitment to the Group C post in a provincialized College of the State, is not applicable and it not having been demonstrated before this Court that there was a prescription of the qualification by the respondent authorities; the appellant, herein, would still not be entitled to be promoted to the cadre of Junior Assistant, in-as-much as, in terms of the seniority list brought on record; there are 3(three) persons, senior to the appellant existing in the non-teaching staff in the cadre of Laboratory Bearer/Library Bearer/Grade-IV, in Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, whose cases would also then be required to be so considered.

9. The provisions of the Assam College Employees (Provincialization) Rules, 2010, more particularly, the provisions of Rule 5 of the said Rules of 2010, mandates that the post of Lower Division Assistant/Laboratory Assistant/ Library Assistant shall be filled up by direct recruitment as well as from the cadre of Laboratory Bearer/Library Bearer/Grade-IV, having qualification as prescribed in the ratio of 75:25. The respondent authorities having laid down the qualification for recruitment to the post of Lower Division Assistant(now rechristened as Junior Assistant)/Laboratory Assistant/Library Assistant, vide the Guidelines as notified by the Notification, dated 09.02.2017; the learned Single Judge having held that the same would also be applicable in case of recruitment to the post of Junior Assistant from the cadre of Laboratory Bearer/Library Bearer/Grade- IV, no material having been brought on record by Mr. Mir, learned counsel for the appellant, to dispute such conclusion reached by the learned Single Judge in the order, dated 25.01.2023, passed in WP(c)311/2023, we are not persuaded by the learned counsel for the appellant, to take a contrary Page No.# 6/6

view than that was so taken by the learned Single Judge vide order, dated 25.01.2023, in WP(c)311/2023.

10. In that view of the matter, we are of the considered view that the order, dated 25.01.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge, in WP(c)311/2023, would not mandate any interference and accordingly, the instant writ appeal is held to be bereft of any merit and consequently, the same is hereby dismissed.

11. No costs.

                         JUDGE                  CHIEF JUSTICE




Comparing Assistant
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter