Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8574 Gua
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2024
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010243162024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6053/2024
M/S INDRAPRASTH MOTORS AND ANR.
A PARTNERSHIP, FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT, NO.1 DOLABARI, NH 37,
TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM- 784001, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PROPRIETOR.
2: RITESH KUMAR TIBREWALA
RESIDENT OF GANESH BUILDING COMPOUND
POLO FIELD ROAD
TEZPUR
DIST- SONITPUR
ASSAM
784001
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI.
2:CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
1ST FLOOR
TOWER
NBCC PLAZA
SECTOR- 5
PUSHP VIHAR
NEW DELHI- 110017.
3:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
STATE GST
KAR BHAWAN
DISPUR
Page No.# 2/4
GUWAHATI
ASSAM.
4:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
TEZPUR ZONE
TEZPUR
DIST.SONITPUR
ASSAM.
5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM
FINANCE (TAXATION) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M L GOPE, MS. N HAWELIA
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, FINANCE AND TAXATION,SC, GST
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
22.11.2024
Heard Ms. N. Hawelia, learned counsel for the petitioners.
By filing this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the impugned
order dated 16.08.2024 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, i.e
the respondent no.4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners have referred to the judgment of the
Coordinate Bench of this Court rendered on 19.09.2024 in WP(C) No.3585/2024 Page No.# 3/4
to submit that the Single Bench of this Court has concluded that the show-cause
notice as well as the order passed by the GST Department has been interfered
with on the ground that they are time barred and it is submitted that facts
involved in this case are similar and covered.
Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Finance & Taxation
Department for the respondent nos. 3 to 5 submits that the Central GST has
preferred a review petition against the said judgment. However, he is not aware
as to the status or any order that has been in that review petition.
Let notice be issued, returnable within 3 (three) weeks.
Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned CGC appears for the respondent no.1, Mr. S.C.
Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, CGST appears for the respondent nos. 2 and
Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Finance & Taxation Department
appears for the respondent nos. 3 to 5.
Since all the respondents are duly represented by their respective counsel,
Notices are waived. However, extra copies be furnished within 3 (three) working
days from today.
Let this matter be listed in the month of 3 rd week of January, 2025 on a
date to be fixed by Registry.
No coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners till the next date Page No.# 4/4
fixed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!