Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8544 Gua
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2024
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010022632024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/529/2024
M/S INDUS TOWERS LIMITED
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED)
A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 7956 HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT 6TH
FLOOR,
BIJAY CRESENT, G.S. ROAD,
RUKMINIGAON, KAMRUP, ASSAM, 781022 AND IN THE PRESENT
PROCEEDINGS REPRESENTED BY SRI SANJAY WADHWA, THE TAXTION
HEAD OF THE PETITIONER COMPANY.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, HAVING IS
OFFICE AT 137, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001.
2:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CX
DIVISION II
GUWAHATI CGST COMMISSIONERATE
ASSAM
GST BHAWAN
KEDAR ROAD
FANCY BAZAAR
GUWAHATI-781001.
3:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CX
GUWAHATI COMMISSIONERATE
ASSAM
GST BHAWAN
Page No.# 2/3
KEDAR ROAD
GUWAHATI-781001
4:THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
1ST FLOOR
TOWER NBCC PLAZA
1
SECTOR-5 PUSH VIHAR
NEW DELHI-110017
5:THE CHAIRPERSON
GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL
5TH FLOOR
TOWER II
JEEVAN BHARTI BUILDING
JANPATH ROAD
CONNAUGHT PLACE
NEW DELHI-11000
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR ANKIT KANODIA, MR. Z ISLAM,MS. N UPADHYAY,MR. P
DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GST, MR. S C KEYAL
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
21.11.2024 Heard Mr. A Kanodia, learned counsel as well as Mr. P Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, GST.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before the Court a Judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench rendered in Barkataki Print and Media Services Vs. Union of India [W.P(C) No. 3585/2024 and Ors] vide Judgment and Page No.# 3/3
Order dated 19.09.2024. He submits that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has held that Notification No. 56/2023-CT is ultra vires the Central Act and that same is not legally sustainable in law and the same has been set aside and quashed.
Per contra, Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, GST submits that the basis of interference of the Notification by the Co-ordinate Bench is primarily on the ground that he did not have the GST council's recommendation as mandated under the Act, which however has been subsequently ratified by the
GST Council in its 53rd Meeting. However, the said fact could not be placed before the Court at the time of the hearing and that they have now taking steps to file a review against the said Judgment and Order dated 19.09.2024. He further submits that he would like to file counter affidavit in the writ petition. He prays for two weeks time.
Matter be listed after two weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry.
Interim order passed on 12.02.2024 will continue till then.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!