Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8500 Gua
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2024
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010225492024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5907/2024
KULAI DAS
S/O SRI BHADRESWAR DAS,
VILLAGE CHILATOLA, PO BALICHAPORI, PS GARMUR, DIST MAJULI,
ASSAM 785104
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, FISHERY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006
2:ASSAM FISHERY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
VIP ROAD
CHACHAL GUWAHATI 781036
3:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
ASSAM FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
VIP ROAD
CHACHAL GUWAHATI 781036
4:MISSING AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL (MAC)
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE MEMBER
GOGAMUKH
PO GOGAMUKH
PS AND DIST DHEMAJI
ASSAM 787034
5:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
MISING AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL
GOGAMUKH
Page No.# 2/4
PO GOGAMUKH
PS AND DIST DHEMAJI
ASSAM 787034
6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
MAJULI DISTRICT GARMUR
PO AND PS GARMUR
DIST MAJULI
ASSAM
7:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE )
MAJULI DISTRICT GARMUR
PO AND PS GARMUR
DIST MAJULI
ASSAM
8:SRI KIRAN PAYENG
S/O SRI SARAT PAYENG
VILLAGE BORGAYAN
PO 1 NO. BARGAYAN
PS GARMUR DIST MAJULI
ASSAM 785104
9:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
MAJULI REVENUE CIRCLE KAMALABARI
PO KAMALABARI
DIST MAJULI
ASSAM 78510
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. H. K. Mahanta, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. U. Das, Addl. Sr. GA
: Mr. D. Gogoi, Standing Counsel
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 20.11.2024
Issue notice making it returnable on 16.12.2024.
Page No.# 3/4
2. None appears on behalf of the Fishery Department of the Government of Assam as well as also for the Assam Fisheries Development Corporation Ltd. on call.
3. Mr. D. Gogoi, the learned Standing counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5; Ms. U. Das, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appears on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 6, 7 and 9 and accepts notice.
4. As the Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 are duly represented by their respective learned counsels, extra copies of the writ petition be served upon them during the course of the day.
5. As regards the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, the Petitioner is directed to serve extra copies upon Mr. P. Sharma, the learned Standing counsel of both the Fishery Department as well as the Assam Fisheries Development Corporation Ltd. during the course of the day.
6. As regards the Respondent No.8, the Petitioner is directed to take steps by way of Registered Post with A/D as well as through usual process within 3 (three) days.
7. In addition to that, the Petitioner is directed to effect service upon the Respondent No.8 by way of dasti routed through the Registry of this Court and file an affidavit of service on or before the next date.
8. The case of the Petitioner herein is that the Petitioner is a settlement holder of Kharjanghuli Meen Mahal which was settled with the Petitioner vide an order dated 16.07.2021 for a period of 7 (seven) years. Be that as it may, the Respondent No.4 had initiated a tender process and settled some portion of the said area falling within the settled fishery of the Page No.# 4/4
Petitioner with the Respondent No.8 vide an order dated 29.06.2024. It is the case of the Petitioner that the said action could not have been taken by the Respondent No.4 and 5 taking into account that the Mising Autonomous Council has no authority or jurisdiction to settle any water body.
9. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner referred to a judgment of this Court in the case of Dibrugarh Fishery Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs. State of Assam dated 20.08.2024 whereby this Court had
categorically held that the Mising Autonomous Council had no authority to make settlement of any fisheries or even natural water bodies in view of the notification dated 07.03.2017.
10. Taking into account that the issue involved in the instant case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Dibrugarh Fishery Cooperative Society Ltd. (supra), this Court stays the settlement
made in favour of the Respondent No.8 dated 29.06.2024.
11. Further to that, the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are directed to forthwith direct the Respondent No.8 not to carry out any further fishing activity on the basis of the order dated 29.06.2024.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!