Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8308 Gua
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2024
Page No.# 1/18
GAHC010249792022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/380/2022
ARABINDA BAISHYA AND 29 ORS
S/O BABUL BAISHYA
2: MAHENDRA PURBEY
S/O RAMBRIKSH PURBEY
3: SUMITRA MARAK
D/O MELARAN SANGMA
4: CHANDANA DAS DUTTA
W/O UTPAL DUTTA
5: DIPAK KR KALITA
S/O PRABIN CH. KALITA
6: ANIMA KALITA
D/O BHABEN KALITA
7: MEHERZAN BEGUM
D/O LT. JALALUDDIN
8: RANU BHARALI
D/O LT. SATISH KALITA
9: LAISHRAM RAMILA CHANU
D/O LT. IBO SINGH LAISHRAM
10: AFJAL HUSSAIN
S/O AJIM UDDIN LASHKAR
11: ABDUL BARIK AHMED
S/O SOBAHAN MONDAL
12: LAKSHMI THAKURIA DAS
Page No.# 2/18
D/O LALIT THAKURIA
13: RUPOM SAIKIA
S/O NIRANJAN SAIKIA
14: NILIMA DUTTA
D/O SUREN DAS
15: BHUPEN BARUAH
S/O GANESH BARUAH
16: KADIR HUSSAIN
S/O JAINAL HUSSAIN
17: KAMAL BAYAN
S/O LOHIT BAYAN
18: AMIRON NESSA
S/O KHUSAL ALI
19: LAKHESHWAR NATH
S/O KHIROD MOHAN NATH
20: DEIJI BEGUM
D/O KAMINI CH. DAS
21: JAYANTA DAS
S/O DEBEN DAS
22: ANOWAR HUSSAIN
PRESIDENT AMAR PRAYAS GOSTHI )
23: DIPIKA DEVI
D/O AJAY KR. SARMA
24: DEWANTI DEVI
D/O NATHUNI SAH
25: RABINDRA DEKA
S/O SARAT CH. DEKA
26: SARAT CH DEKA
S/O GAMBHIR CH DEKA
27: SANTA KALITA
D/O RATNESWAR KALITA
Page No.# 3/18
28: RAFIKUL ISLAM
S/O SADEK ALI
29: MINAL ALI
S/O HANIF ALI
30: SATYENDRA KR. ROY
S/O TILAK ROY
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF BISHNU NAGAR
UDAY NAGAR
DAKHIN GAON
GUWAHATI
POST OFFICE-KAHILIPARA
POLICE STATION- DISPUR
DISTRICT- KAMRUP ( METRO)
ASSAM
PIN-78101
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
REP. BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF HOME, ASSAM,
DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781006.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
MINES AND MINERALS DEPTT.
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
PIN- 781006.
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (METROPOLITAN)
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI
PIN- 781036.
4:THE CIRCLES OFFICER
DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
BASISTHA
GUWAHATI
PIN- 781028
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY, P. DEKA,MR D KALITA,MR. G
HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
Page No.# 4/18
Linked Case : WA/370/2022
KESHAB BARMAN AND 153 ORS.
S/O LATE KOKIL BARMAN
2: HAREKRISHNA SARMA
S/O LATE KRIPANATH SARMA
3: ARUN KUMAR GHOSH
S/O MOHAN LAL GHOSH
4: BIPUL DEKA
S/O HAREN DEKA
5: ARUN RAJBONGSHI
S/O KRISHNA RAJBONGSHI
6: RAJIB DEORI
S/O LT. MOTILAL DEORI
7: MANIK SAIKIA
S/O LT. CHANDRA KANTA SAIKIA
8: LOLIT CH DEORI
S/O NABIN DEORI
9: PRANAB JYOTI BORDOLOI
S/O DAMODAR BORDOLOI
10: HEMANTA KALITA
S/O LT DHARMA KALITA
11: SUBHA DEVI
D/O CHANDRA LAL SARMA
12: PARITOSH BARMAN
S/O MUNINDRA BARMAN
13: RABIN SARMA
S/O BASANTA SARMA
14: MAHIBUL ISLAM
S/O FATENUR ALI
Page No.# 5/18
15: RUP KUMAR DEORI
S/O PRASANTA DEORI
16: HEMANTA KR KALITA
S/O LT CHANDRA KANTA KALITA
17: SABITA DEKA
D/O HARI DEKA
18: GOPESH SARMA
S/O LT BASANTA SRAMA
19: PUSHPANJALI DUTTA
D/O MUNIN DUTTA
20: SHAMBHU KUMAR
S/O RAMSAGAR ROY
21: JOYMATI BARMAN
S/O LT TILAK BARMAN
22: KUMUD CHANDRA DAS
S/O BHADRESWAR DAS
23: RAMESH MEDHI
S/O JOGESHWAR MEDHI
24: LAKHI DEKA
S/O LT KATHA RAM DEKA
25: RAJKUMAR MANDAL
S/O LT SANTOSH MANDAL
26: GIRIN MAHANTA
S/O DHIRESWAR MAHANTA
27: DEBEN DAS
S/O LT SATYA DAS
28: PRADIP DHAR
S/O ADHIR DHAR
29: DIPEN DAS
S/O NARMESWAR DAS
30: DINESH HALOI
S/O BAKUL HALOI
Page No.# 6/18
31: HIREN KR BAISHYA
S/O LT MADHAB CHANDRA BAISHYA
32: HANSADHAR SARMA
S/O LT HARENDRA SARMA
33: GOBINDA BORO
S/O DANDIRAM BORO
34: BOLO NATH
S/O RAMESH NATH
35: HARI DEV SARMA
S/O HARENDRA SARMA
36: MALA SAHA
W/O LT. ANIL SAHA
37: MANORANJAN SARMA
S/O TARANI KANTA SRAMA
38: CHAMPADUTTA BISWAS
W/O LT SUBHASH BISWAS
39: UDAY CHAKRABORTY
S/O DIPAK CHAKRABORTY
40: SONARAM DAS
S/O LT KHARGESWAR DAS
41: LAXMI PAUL
W/O BIBHASH RANJAN PAUL
42: MOUMITA DEORI
S/O SANJIB DEORI
43: NRIPEN MEDHI
S/O RATNAKAR MEDHI
44: JOYMATI TUDU
W/O PARAMESH HEMBROM
45: PRANAB NATH
S/O SURJYA KANTA NATH
46: PRADIP DAS
S/O MUHIRAM DAS
Page No.# 7/18
47: AMASHREE BORO
W/O DOYARAM BORO
48: PABITRA DAS
S/O LT NARMESWAR DAS
49: MANTU KALITA
S/O CHANDRA KALITA
50: GUNUN BORDOLOI
S/O LT SOMDHAR BORDOLOI
51: JITU HIRA
S/O BANESWAR HIRA
52: MOON MOON SARMA BARUA
W/O PRANJIT BARUA
53: PABITRA SANGMAI
S/O BOGEN SANGMAI
54: PALLABI DAS
W/O MUN THAKURIA
55: RAJESH KARMAKAR
S/O GOLAP KARMAKAR
56: BIMALA PRASAD RABHA
D/O LT GOJEN CHANDRA RABHA
57: RABINDRA NATH TALUKDAR
S/O PARAMANANDA TALUKDAR
58: BIDYUT DOWARAH
S/O DEVA KR DOWARAH
59: AJAY BARUAH
S/O NABA BARUAH
60: RANJAN KR KAKATI
S/O LT KHAGEN KAKATI
61: AKAN BALA MEDHI KALITA
S/O RAJANI KALITA
62: ANITA BORO GOYARY
W/O LATE THANESWAR GOYARY
Page No.# 8/18
63: LACHIT MUCHAHARI
S/O JITEN MUSHAHARI
64: INDE KHATTAIYA DEORI
S/O LT DEBANANDA DEORI
65: PUJI KANTA DEORI
S/O RUPRAM DEORI
66: SITAL MALLIK
C/O ABHIJIT MALIK
67: TARANI BORO
S/O KANDRO BORO
68: DEBARAJ KOCH
S/O HARIDAS KOCH
69: KHAGEN HAZARIKA
S/O LAMBODHAR HAZARIKA
70: NIBARAN CH ROY
S/O BEDELA CH ROY
71: PANCHAM RAY
S/O BUDU RAY
72: JITEN DEORI
S/O SONORAM DEORI
73: PHULESWAR SONOWAL
S/O SANJAY SONOWAL
74: PUNIRAM PATHAK
S/O LT BHABANANDA PATHAK
75: RANJIT DEORI
C/O TARUN CH DEORI
76: GOPAL CHANDRA BISWAS
S/O LT MUKUNDA BISWAS
77: JADAV NATH
S/O LT GOTIRAM NATH
78: AMRIT SARENGI
S/O MRIGANKA SARENGI
Page No.# 9/18
79: BHADRESWAR RAY
S/O BHOLARAM RAY
80: UTTAM KR GHOSH
S/O SUDHANGSHU GHOSH
81: HARESH PHUKAN
S/O KUL PHUKAN
82: GAGAN CHANDRA DEKA
S/O LT HOLIRAM DEKA
83: RANJIT MAJUMDAR
S/O ASHUTOSH MAZUMDAR
84: GANESH BARMAN
S/O LT DINESH BARMAN
85: BILESWAR BORO
S/O LT SAYARAM BORO
86: JUGANTA DEORI
S/O BHUPEN DEORI
87: KALINDRA KUMAR BAISHYA
S/O SARAT BAISHYA
88: MINATI DEY
W/O LATE MUNINDRA DEY
89: MERY DEORI
W/O LATE BISWAJIT DEORI
90: SIBASARAN BARMAN
S/O LT SURENDRA BARMAN
91: AMRITA SAHU
W/O JHARILAL SAHU
92: GAJEN CH DAS
S/O DANDIRAM DAS
93: GOPAL RAI
S/O MAN BAHADUR RAI
94: KANAK DEKA
Page No.# 10/18
S/O BIPIN CHANDRA DEKA
95: NIRANJAN NATH
S/O DHANIRAM NATH
96: MALAYA DEKA
W/O LATE MUKUNDA RAM DEKA
97: GASATI GOYARI
S/O THANESWAR GOYARI
98: PHULO DEVI
W/O LATE RAM CHANDRA PASWAN
99: ARUP KAKATI
S/O LT KHAGEN KAKATI
100: BHAKTA MAZUMDAR
S/O KARTIK MAZUMDAR
101: MINU RAJBONGSHI
W/O MOBJAL RAJBONHGSHI
102: MRIDUL KALITA
S/O BALI KANTA KALITA
103: DIPALI MANDAL
W/O LATE KANAI MANDAL
104: BHUBNESWAR BORO
S/O KASTURAM BORO
105: MONI MANDAL
S/O RABI MANDAL
106: BINOD KALITA
S/O NABIN KALITA
107: SUNIMA DAS
W/O LATE SIDANANDA DAS
108: GANESH SARKAR
S/O NIBARAN SARKAR
109: SUMATI DAS
W/O LATE CHANDRA DEB NATH
110: PRASANTA DUTTA
Page No.# 11/18
S/O LOLIT CHANDRA DUTTA
111: BHIM MAZUMDAR
S/O LT KARTIK MAZUMDAR
112: RAMEN DEKA
S/O BAIKUNTHA DEKA
113: SUREN KALITA
S/O SARBESWAR KALITA
114: RITU BARMAN
S/O SUDARSAN BARMAN
115: SUMI BHUYAN ROY
W/O PROMOD ROY
116: SANJIB DEORI
S/O SAKHIDHAR DEORI
117: MAHADEV SARMA
S/O KRISHNA SARMA
118: JADAV BARMAN
S/O HARESWAR BARMAN
119: DURGESWAR DEORI
S/O BHAGADATTA DEORI
120: BABUL NATH
S/O HARENDRA NATH
121: DHANIRUDDIN ALI
S/O SAYED ALI
122: RAMENDRA BARMAN
S/O RAIMOHAN BARMAN
123: BIMALA NATH
W/O KAMAL KUMAR NATH
124: PRANABJYOTI DEKA
S/O KARRUN CH DEKA
125: KRISHNA KAKATI
S/O NILAMONI KAKATI
126: SANTI NEWAR
Page No.# 12/18
W/O AMAR BAHADUR NEWAR
127: KUSHAL DEKA
S/O KULEN DEKA
128: RAJU ALI
S/O GILIMA BEGUM
129: BOLIN PHUKAN
S/O SAMESWAR PHUKAN
130: GAMIR ALI
S/O SAMIR ALI
131: RAFIQUL HAQUE
S/O SAMSUL HAQUE
132: PAPU NATH
S/O PRAHLAD NATH
133: NURJAHAN BEGUM
W/O SAMSUL HAQUE
134: PRABIN MECH
S/O RABI RAM MECH
135: BHAGWAN CHANDRA RAY
S/O BIKASH RAY
136: BHADRESWAR ADHIKARI
S/O SHYAMAL ADHIKARI
137: GUNESWAR DEORI
S/O LT. GANABAHADUR DEORI
138: PRAMOD CH. SARMA
S/O LT. GOPI KANTA SARMA
139: SONMANI DAS
S/O KAMESH DAS
140: DEEPANWITA DAS
W/O PANKAJ KR. DAS.
141: TULA RAM SWARGIWARI
S/O LT. BALIN RAM SWARGIWARI
142: BINOD PRASAD
Page No.# 13/18
S/O RAJBALAM PRASAD
143: PUSPA HARAN SAIKIA
S/O LT. PUHARAM NATH.
144: RAMESWAR BANIA
S/O LT. JAYRAM BANIA
145: HARIPADA BISWAS
S/O GOPAL CHANDRA BISWAS.
146: DHARMESWAR SAIKIA
S/O LT. UMESH SAIKIA
147: SONESWAR RAY
S/O AHARURAM RAY
148: MAHIM CH. DEORI
S/O GAJANANDA DEORI
149: BISHNU MEDHI
S/O SHANKHADHAR MEDHI
150: SUBHASH SARMA
S/O RAJENDRA CH. SARMA.
151: RAJU PATHAK
S/O LT. JOGENDRA PATHAK
152: MENAKA BASUMATARY
D/O DANGCHURAM BASUMATARY
153: BHASKAR JYOTI KALITA
S/O MONARANJAN KALITA
154: SONMANI DAS
S/O KAMESH DAS
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF DAKHIN GAON
SAUKUCHI
GUWAHATI
POST OFFICE-SAUKUCHI
POLICE STATION- DISPUR
DISTRICT- KAMRUP( METRO)
ASSAM
PIN-781040
VERSUS
Page No.# 14/18
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOME
ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
PIN-781006
2:THE SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DM (L R) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
PIN-781006
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (M)
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI
PIN-781036
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
BASISTHA
GUWAHATI
PIN-781028
------------
For petitioner(s)/appellant(s) : Mr. K. N. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate Mr. T. Deuri, Advocate
For respondent(s) : Mr. R.K. Bora, Addl. Sr. GA, Assam Ms. N. Bordoloi, SC, Revenue
- BEFORE -
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR 13.11.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) Of these two writ appeals, WA No. 370/2022 is preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 09.11.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 7159/2022, and WA No. 380/2022 is preferred by the appellants therein Page No.# 15/18
challenging the order dated 17.11.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 7338/2022.
In WP(C) No. 7159/2022, the writ petitioners/appellants had essentially challenged the General Eviction Notice dated 01.11.2022 and in WP(C) No. 7338/2022, the petitioners/appellants had challenged the General Eviction Notice dated 10.11.2022. By the said two General Eviction Notices, the general public residing over the land covered by Dag No. 1076 of Dakhingaon under Beltola Mouza, Guwahati in the district of Kamrup (M), were directed to vacate the government land within a period of three days from the date of issuance of the said Notice.
The learned Single Judge, after considering the arguments advanced by the rival parties, has disposed of the writ petitions vide the impugned orders dated 09.11.2022 and 17.11.2022, respectively, and has set aside the Eviction Notices dated 01.11.2022 and 10.11.2022 only to the extent of granting three days' time to the appellants to vacate the land occupied by them. The learned Single Judge has directed the respondents to give to the appellants another three weeks' time from the date of the judgment to vacate the land illegally occupied by them, to enable them to make alternative arrangements. The learned Single Judge has further observed that the extension of time given to the appellants for vacating the land would be subject to the condition that the appellants had not already been evicted from the lands occupied by them.
Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants in WA No. 380/2022 has argued that a Division Bench of this Court, in Sakek Uddin (Md.) vs. State of Assam & Ors., reported in GLT 2024 (4) 857, while answering a Reference, has passed the judgment dated 27.06.2024 by holding that prior to initiation of a proceeding under Rule 18(2) of the Settlement Rules, the occupant/possessor of government land has to be issued notice. It is submitted that the notice to the occupants/possessors of the government land has to be individual notice and, considering the judgment of the Division Bench in Sakek Uddin (Md.) (supra), a Single Page No.# 16/18
Bench of this Court has already disposed of a writ petition, being WP(C) 3715/2020, vide judgment dated 07.11.2024 directing the respondents to issue individual notices to the alleged encroachers of the government land. It is submitted that these writ appeals can be disposed of in terms of the directions issued by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 3715/2020, vide judgment dated 07.11.2024.
Learned counsel appearing for the State respondents have fairly conceded that similar directions may be issued to the respondents as have been issued by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 3715/2020, vide judgment dated 07.11.2024. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, these writ appeals are disposed of with the following directions:
(i) The respondents shall issue fresh individual notices to the appellants/alleged encroachers of the government land in respect of which the General Eviction Notices dated 01.11.2022 and 10.11.2022 had been issued, asking them to show cause as to why they should not be evicted from the government land by taking recourse to Rule 18 of the Settlement Rules. The respondents shall issue such individual notices to the appellants/alleged encroachers within a period of 30 (thirty) days from today.
(ii) The appellants in the present two writ appeals are at liberty to submit individual replies to the notices to be issued by the respondents, along with documentary evidence, if any, showing cause that they have bona fide claim over the plots of land under their occupation and, as such, recourse to Rule 18 of the Settlement Rules is not permissible. Such replies to the individual notices shall be filed by the appellants/alleged encroachers within a period of 15 (fifteen) days from the date of issuance of the individual notices.
(iii) The District Commissioner, Kamrup (M), shall provide opportunity of hearing to the appellants/alleged encroachers either Page No.# 17/18
personally, or through their authorized representatives and shall, thereupon, pass appropriate speaking orders. The District Commissioner, Kamrup (M) is further directed to allot a particular area in his office for submission of replies by the appellants.
(iv) The District Commissioner, Kamrup (M), upon passing of the speaking order(s), as directed hereinabove, shall notify on the Notice Board of his office about passing of the speaking order(s).
(v) The District Commissioner, Kamrup (M), to complete the exercise, as directed above, within a period of three months from today.
(vi) Until completion of the exercise, as directed above, no coercive measures shall be taken against the appellants.
(vii) It is also made clear that if any of the appellants fail to respond to the notice to be issued under Rule 18 of the Settlement Rules, within the time stipulated above, the respondents shall be free to take action in accordance with law.
(viii) As prayed for by the appellants herein, it is provided that the above directions shall not preclude the right of the appellants to prefer individual applications before the jurisdictional District Commissioner praying for allotment of plot of land by invoking the provisions of the Assam Land Policy, 2019, or any other policy presently holding the field in this connection.
In the event of filing such application by any or all the appellants, the jurisdictional District Commissioner shall take steps for causing due consideration of such applications, independent of the process for removal of encroachment, in terms of the direction Nos. (i) to (vii) passed hereinabove, and shall dispose of such applications expeditiously and strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Page No.# 18/18
Assam Land Policy, 2019, or any other policy presently in vogue in this connection, and communicate the outcome thereof to the appellants.
In the event the jurisdictional District Commissioner is not competent to consider and dispose of the applications under the Assam Land Policy, 2019, he shall take steps for having the applications placed before the competent authority empowered to consider such applications, which authority shall also consider such applications expeditiously and strictly in accordance with the Assam Land Policy, 2019, or any other policy presently in vogue in this connection, and communicate to the appellants the outcome thereof.
Ordered accordingly.
Writ appeals stand disposed of with the above observations and directions.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!