Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1359 Gua
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010139552017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2954/2017
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
A PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKING CO. REGISTERED AND INCORPORATED
UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 24
WHITES ROADS, CHENNAI 600014 WITH ONE OF ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT
CHIBBER HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI-5, REPRESENTED
BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, GUWAHATI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
MD. NURUL ISLAM MAZUMDER and 2 ORS,
S/O LATE HAZI ATAR ALI BARBHUYAN, R/O VILL. NIZ LAVERPUTA, PART-
II, P.O. SADIRKHAL, P.S. KATIGORAH, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM.
2:KRISHNADHAN PAUL
S/O LATE HARI BUSHAN PAUL
R/O VILL. PANIBORA
O.P. and P.S. DHOLAI
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM.
3:KRISHNA MOHAN SINGH
S/O LATE KALA SINGH
R/O VILL. BORKHOLA
P.O. and P.S. BORKHOLA
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.R C PAUL
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S D PURKAYASTHA
Page No.# 2/3
Linked Case :
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
VERSUS
MD MURUL ISLAM MAZUMDER and 2 ORS
2:THE ADDIDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
BORDER
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI-781022
3:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
BORDER
HQ B ASSAM
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI.
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
B ASSAM
GUWAHATI.
5:THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
HOME DEPTT.
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
------------
Advocate for : MR. S BASUMATARY
Advocate for : appearing for MD MURUL ISLAM MAZUMDER and 2 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
31.03.2023.
Page No.# 3/3
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. D. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 16 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and award dated 27.03.2017, passed by the learned Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Cachar, Silcahr, in MAC Case No. 267/2009. The cause of delay is explained at paragraphs- 4 and 5 of the connected application.
Mr. S. D. Purkayastha, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 submits that he will have no objection, if delay is condoned.
Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents as well as the pleadings made in the paragraphs 4 and 5 of the connected application, this Court is of the opinion that the present applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in preferring the connected appeal within time.
Accordingly, the delay is condoned.
IA stands disposed of.
Registry to register the connected appeal, if same is not defective and list for Admission by showing the name of Mr. S. D. Purkayastha, learned counsel as the counsel for the respondent No. 2 in the cause list.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!