Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2361 Gua
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010120382023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/197/2023
OM PARKASH TOKAS
S/O SRI VIRBHAN TOKAS,
PRESENTLY RESIDENT AT KUKURMARI, DHALIGAON, DIST.- CHIRANG,
ASSAM.
(POSTED AS COMMANDANT, 156 BN, CRPF, IRLA NO. 4798, CHIRANG,
ASSAM).
PERMANENT RESIDENT OF H.NO. 22-B, MUNIRKA VILLAGE, NEW DELHI,
PIN- 110007.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW
DELHI, PIN- 110001.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
CGO COMPLEX
LODHI ROAD
NEW DELHI-110003.
3:THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR GENERAL
CENTRAL ZONE
CRPF
SECTOR-III
SALT LAKE
KOLKATA-106.
4:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (PERS)
CRPF
C.G.O. COMPLEX
LODHI ROAD
NEW DELHI-110003.
Page No.# 2/3
5:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
WB SECTOR
CRPF
WEST BENGAL-700106.
6:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
NE SECTOR
CRPF
SHILLONG-793001.
7:THE DIG RANGE SILIGURI
CRPF
WEST BENGAL-734012.
8:THE DIG (OPS) LOWER ASSAM
BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 783385
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
Date : 05-06-2023 (M. Zothankhuma, J)
Heard Mr. S Dey, learned counsel for the appellant, who submits that the appellant has been transferred vide impugned order dated 11.05.2023, in violation of the guidelines of the CRPF, which governs the transfer of its officers, providing that three years would be the normal tenure to any post.
The appellant's counsel submits that after being promoted to the post of Commandant, the appellant was posted at Avadi, Chennai on 09.06.2017. On 31.12.2017, the appellant was posted at 97 Bn, RAF/CRPF. Thereafter, the appellant was posted in the office of the IGP, Odisha Sector at BBSR, Odisha on Page No.# 3/3
22.02.2019. After completion of two years, the appellant was transferred to 156 BN, CRPF, Kukurmari, Dhaligaon, Chirang District, Assam on 04.12.2021. Though the appellant is to retire on 30.04.2024, the appellant has been issued the impugned transfer order dated 29.05.2023, even though he has less than eleven months of service.
On considering the above facts, this Court is of the view that the reasons for the said transfer should be brought to the notice of this Court. Accordingly, Mr. RKD Choudhury, learned Deputy SGI is granted a week's time to obtain instructions in this matter.
List the matter after a week.
In the interim, the impugned order dated 11.05.2023 and the judgment and order dated 29.05.2023 passed in WP(C) No. 3058/2023 shall remain stayed till the next returnable date.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!