Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 787 Gua
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2023
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010034732016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/10/2023
ON THE DEATH OF LATE DHAN KHAN, HIS LEGAL HEIRS SAIRA BEGUM
AND ORS
W/O LATE DHAN KHAN,
RO NIZ TENGAKHAT GAON,
MOUZA AND PS TENGAKHAT,
DISTRICT - DIBRUGARH, ASSAM,
PIN 786103
1.1: RINA BEGUM
D/O LATE DHAN KHAN
RO NIZ TENGAKHAT GAON
MOUZA AND PS TENGAKHAT
DISTRICT - DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN 786103
1.2: RAMJAN KHAN
S/O LATE DHAN KHAN
RO NIZ TENGAKHAT GAON
MOUZA AND PS TENGAKHAT
DISTRICT - DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN 786103
1.3: ISLAM KHAN
S/O LATE DHAN KHAN
RO NIZ TENGAKHAT GAON
MOUZA AND PS TENGAKHAT
DISTRICT - DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN 786103
Page No.# 2/4
1.4: MASFIKA BEGUM
D/O LATE DHAN KHAN
RO NIZ TENGAKHAT GAON
MOUZA AND PS TENGAKHAT
DISTRICT - DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN 78610
VERSUS
LEGAL HEIRS OF RASHID HUSSAIN , AMINA KHATUN AND ORS
W/O LATE RASHID HUSSAIN,
RO NIZA TENGAKHAT GAON,
MOUZA- 7 ,PS TENGAKHAT, DISTRICT DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN 786103
1.1:REYAZ HUSSAIN
S/O LATE RASHID HUSSAIN
RO NIZA TENGAKHAT GAON
MOUZA- 7
PS TENGAKHAT
DISTRICT DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN 786103
1.2:MANIMA BEGUM
D/O LATE RASHID HUSSAIN
RO NIZA TENGAKHAT GAON
MOUZA- 7
PS TENGAKHAT
DISTRICT DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN 786103
1.3:ABIDA BEGUM
D/O LATE RASHID HUSSAIN
RO NIZA TENGAKHAT GAON
MOUZA- 7
PS TENGAKHAT
DISTRICT DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN 78610
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.P S DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A K GUPTA
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
27. 02. 2023
Heard Mr. BK Bhagawati, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. AK Gupta, learned counsel for all the respondents.
The present appeal is against the judgment and order dated 10.09.2015 passed in TA No. 07/2010 by the learned Civil Judge, Dibrugarh whereby the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court dated 04.01.2010 in TS No. 19/2008 was affirmed.
This second appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law.
I. Whether both the courts below wrongly interpreted the provision of Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963, and dismissed the counter claim of defendant as time barred, although the cause of action of counter claim is within the period of limitation?
II. Whether the learned court below committed perversity in deciding the point of limitation of the suit inasmuch as the suit was barred under Article 56, 58, 59 and 64 of the Limitation Act as the plaintiff has admitted at paragraph 5 of the plaint his knowledge of alleged fraud immediately after execution of the sale deed in the year 1983?
Call for the records.
Issue notice, returnable after four weeks.
As Mr. AK Gupta, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of all the Page No.# 4/4
respondents, no formal notice needs to be issued. However, extra copy be furnished to him.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!