Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 675 Gua
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010023342023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/408/2023
DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG AND 3 ORS.
S/O LATE BASANTA HAJONG, R/O VILL-PAKHARAPARA (HAJONG BASTI),
P.O. AND P.S.-BOKO, DIST-KAMRUP (R), ASSAM, PIN-781123
2: AMRIT HAJONG
S/O DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG
R/O VILL-PAKHARAPARA (HAJONG BASTI)
P.O. AND P.S.-BOKO
DIST-KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-781123
3: SMTI. RAJESWARI HAJONG
D/O DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG
R/O VILL-PAKHARAPARA (HAJONG BASTI)
P.O. AND P.S.-BOKO
DIST-KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-781123
4: SMTI. BAJAYANTYI HAJONG
D/O DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG
R/O VILL-PAKHARAPARA (HAJONG BASTI)
P.O. AND P.S.-BOKO
DIST-KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-78112
VERSUS
KHAGEN HAJONG
S/O LATE CHANDRA HAJONG, R/O BONDA COLONY, NARENGI, P.S.-
PRAGJYOTISHPUR, DIST-KAMRUP (M), PIN-781026, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case :
DHIPEN HAJONG @ DHIPES HAJONG AND 3 ORS.
S/O- LATE BASANTA HAJONG
2: AMRIT HAJONG
S/O- DHIPEN HAJONG
3: RAJESWARI HAJONG
D/O- DHIPEN HAJONG
4: BAJAYANTYI HAJONG
D/O- DHIPEN HAJONG
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE PAKHARAPARA ( HAJONG BASTI)
P.O AND P.S BOKO, DIST- KAMRUP ®, ,PIN-781123, ASSAM
VERSUS
KHAGEN HAJONG
S/O- LATE CHANDRA HAJONG
R/O- BONDA COLONY NARENGI
P.S- PRAGJYOTISHPUR
DIST- KAMRUP (M), PIN-781026, ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. R BARUAH
Advocate for : appearing for KHAGEN HAJONG
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 22.2.2023
Heard Mr. A. Iqbal, learned counsel for the petitioner Page No.# 3/3
This is an application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of CPC for condonation of delay of 107 days in preferring the Civil Revision Petition for setting aside the ex-parte Judgment and decree dated 19.7.2022 passed in Land Grabbing Case No. 10/2016.
Issue notice returnable on 23.3.2023.
Applicants shall take steps for service of notice on the respondent by way of registered post with A/D as well as by usual process within a period of three days from today. In addition, the petitioner is allowed to take steps through dasti. However the same should be routed through the Registry of this Court. Thereafter petitioner shall file affidavit in proof of such service.
On perusal of the pleadings in Land Grabbing Case No.10 of 2016, it is clear that the grandfather of the petitioner of the Land Grabbing case and father of the present applicant had jointly purchased the land in question. Therefore, this court is of the prima facie view that joint owner or title holder cannot be termed as land grabber. However, final determination can be made in the Revision petition only, if delay is condoned.
In such view of the matter, a liberty is given to the present applicant to apprise the learned Executing Court regarding pendency of the present application and learned Executing Court may pass necessary order, if such application is filed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!