Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3492 Gua
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010180572022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5914/2022
SHANTANU KUMAR DAS
S/O- LATE SUKUMAR DAS,
R/O-A. C SEN ROAD
P.O, P.S AND DISTRICT - KARIMGANJ , ASSAM, PIN-788710
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
EDUCATION DEPTARTMENT DISPUR, GHY-06
2:THE DIRECTOR
SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPTT.
KAHILIPARA
GHY-19
3:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
KARIMGANJ DISTRICT CIRCLE
P.O AND DIST-KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN-788710
4:DEBASHISH DAS
EX PRINCIPAL
BUDHAN H.S SCHOOL
P.O- OLIVIA CHERRA
P.S- RATABARI
KARIMGANJ
Page No.# 2/3
DIST- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN-788737
5:KRISHNA GOWALA
I/C PRINCIPAL
BUDHAN H.S SCHOOL
P.O- OLIVIA CHERRA
P.S- RATABARI
KARIMGANJ
DIST- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN-78873
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS N SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
ORDER
Date : 31.08.2023
An issue has arisen as to whether a teacher who is originally a teacher in an M.E. school after the M.E. school gets amalgamated with a higher secondary school, would be considered to be a graduate teacher in the higher secondary school under Rule 12(3)(iv) of the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialised Schools) Service Rules, 2018.
We also take note that by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Khagendra Das and Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors., reported in 2019 (1) GLT 583, Rule 12(3)(iv) had been read down to also include 17 years of teaching experience in any high school which may also be a part of a higher Page No.# 3/3
secondary school.
It is the submission of Mr. P.K. Roy, learned senior counsel for the respondent No. 5 that as per the scheme of amalgamation as per the O.M. dated 22.09.2016, upon being amalgamated, the teachers of the existing M.E. school shall be entitled to teach only in classes I to VIII and not beyond. Accordingly, it is the submission of Mr. P.K. Roy, learned senior counsel for the respondent No. 5 that the writ petitioner being originally a teacher of M.E. school prior to the amalgamation would now be entitled to only teach classes I to VIII and therefore, his teaching experience cannot be that of the teaching experience as a graduate teacher in any higher secondary school/which also includes the high school sections of the higher secondary school. Ms. N. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner states that on facts, the petitioner is also required to take classes in XI and XII and therefore the distinctions sought to be made by referring to the amalgamation scheme that a teacher of the M.E. school after amalgamation shall teach only classes I to VIII may not be applicable in the present case.
The respondents to produce the records of the school concerned regarding what nature of classes are being taken by the petitioner. List on 21.09.2023.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!