Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3798 Gua
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2022
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010052722019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case : I.A.(Civil)/2962/2022
M/S. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
HAVING ITS REGISTERED HEAD OFFICE AT E-8
EPIP
SITAPURA INDUSTRIES AREA
JAIPUR
RAJASTHAN- 302022 WITH ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT B.R. ARCHADE
3RD FLOOR
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI- 781007
(REP. BY ITS LEGAL OFFICER
SRI RAJENDRA DUTTA
32 YEARS).
VERSUS
SUFIAN AHMED AND 2 ORS.
S/O- JALAL UDDIN
PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILL.- KURTI
P.O.- KATHALTALI
PIN- 788725
P.S. BAZARICHERRA
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILL.- ARANYAPUR
P.S. KATLICHERRA
PIN- 78861
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM.
2:ABU TAHIR MD. RAZAWOL KARIM
S/O- MD. ABDUL AZIZ
Page No.# 2/3
R/O- VILL.- NEW NAVIPUR
P.O. BARAIGRAM
PIN- 788719
P.S.- PATHAERKHANDI
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM. (OWNER OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO. AS-11
BC-4255).
------------
Advocate for : MR. P HAZARIKA
Advocate for : MR. M H LASKAR appearing for SUFIAN AHMED AND 2 ORS.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
ORDER
Date : 26.09.2022 Heard Mr. R.P. Hazarika, learned counsel for the appellant/ Insurance Company and Mr. M. Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2/ claimants.
By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant/Insurance Company has prayed for stay of the operation of the impugned judgment and award dated 25.06.2018, passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hailakandi in MAC Case No. 219/2016.
As the appeal is admitted, the prayer for stay of the operation of the impugned judgment and award dated 25.06.2018, passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hailakandi in MAC Case No. 219/2016 is hereby stayed, subject to deposit of 50% of the awarded amount by the Insurance Company/ applicant to the Registry of this Court within six weeks from today.
The learned counsel for the Insurance Company/ applicant submits that they have preferred appeal on the ground that as per G.D. Entry registered after the Page No.# 3/3
accident two vehicles were involved in the case, but FIR shows the number of other vehicles. As such claimants should execute a bond at the time of releasing money by the Registry, that if required, amount shall be refunded to the Insurance Company.
The learned counsel for the claimant/ respondent has made no objection on the prayer of the Insurance Company. Hence, prayer of the applicant is allowed.
The Registry is directed to do the needful at the time of releasing the amount to the claimants after proper verification and identification of the claimants by the concerned lawyer.
The I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!