Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Samlai Narzary vs The State Of Assam And 5 Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 1617 Gua

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1617 Gua
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2022

Gauhati High Court
Samlai Narzary vs The State Of Assam And 5 Ors on 13 May, 2022
                                                            Page No.# 1/6

GAHC010084942022




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/3108/2022

         SAMLAI NARZARY
         S/O LT. JALARSING NARZARY
         R/O VILL- PARBATJHORA P.O.KOILA MOILA
         DIST. CHIRANG, BTR, ASSAM



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
         THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF
         ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,
         GUWAHATI-06.

         2:THE COMMISSIONER

          PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
          ASSAM
          JURIPAR
          PANJABARI
          GUWAHATI-37.

         3:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL

          REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
          BTC
          P.O. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR
          PIN CODE- 783370

         4:THE SECRETARY

          P AND R.D. BTC
          KOKRAJHAR
          P.O. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR
                                                                       Page No.# 2/6

             ASSAM
             PIN-783370

            5:THE DIRECTOR

             PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
             BTC
             P.O. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR
             ASSAM
             PN-783370

            6:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BOROBAZAR T.
             DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
             BOROBAZAR
             P.O. BOROBAZAR
             DIST. CHIRANG
             BTR
            ASSAM
            PIN-78339

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR R DHAR

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D.




                                     BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                         ORDER

Date : 13-05-2022

Heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. N.K. Deb Nath, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development Department [P&RD] for the respondent nos. 1 & 2; and Mr. S.R. Rabha, learned Standing Counsel, BTC for the respondent nos. 3-6.

2. The subject-matter in this writ petition is execution of a contract work viz. 'Construction of road Palangsuguri to West Gumurgaon Village road RCC box culvert with sand gravel' ['the Contract-Work', for short] and non-disbursal of an Page No.# 3/6

amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- in favour of the petitioner which the petitioner has claimed to be due from the authorities in the BTC.

3. The case projected by the petitioner in this writ petition, in brief, is that Administrative Approval for the Contract-Work was accorded on 20.06.2018. Thereafter, the Technical Sanction was accorded on 27.06.2016 [Annexure-2 to the writ petition] for the Contract-Work. The petitioner has asserted that after compliance of the requisite formalities, he proceeded to execute the Contract- Work as per the specifications, drawings and agreement and completed the same. The authorities in the respondent BTC physically verified the Contract- Work and found that the Contract-Work had been completed as per the specifications, drawings, and agreement. The petitioner has stated that the total value of the Contract-Work is Rs. 15,00,000/-. The petitioner has submitted his final bill amounting to Rs. 15,00,000/- to the respondent authorities. Out of the said total contract value of Rs. 15,00,000/-, the petitioner has already been paid

an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- as a 1 st installment. It is the case of the petitioner that though the respondent no. 4 issued an order dated 24.03.2021 [Annexure- 5] according sanction to release the balance amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- but the same has not yet been disbursed in favour of the petitioner.

4. Mr. Rabha, learned Standing Counsel, BTC has submitted that though from the documents annexed to this writ petition, it is prima facie reflected that the petitioner had completed the Contract-Work but still there is requirement for verification of the matter. It is submitted that a decision has been taken by the respondent BTC authorities to examine all the pending claims relating to contract works and to that effect the respondent no. 3 has passed an order on Page No.# 4/6

15.11.2021. As per the said order, the respondent BTC authorities have undertaken to examine all the cases relating to outstanding liabilities within a period of 6 [six] months from the date of issuance of the said order. Mr. Rabha has submitted that the case of the petitioner can be considered in similar manner as indicated in the order dated 15.11.2021. Mr. Rabha has placed a copy of the said order before this Court.

5. The order bearing No. BTC/F(Audit)/49/2021/Pt-I/1] dated Kokrajhar, the

15th November, 2021 reads as under :-

"BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL SECRETARIAT BODOFA NWGWR::KOKRAJHAR

No. BTC/F(Audit)49/2021/Pt-I/1 Dated- Kokrajhar, the 15th November, 2021

ORDER

WHEREAS it has been noticed that huge number of outstanding liabilities have been created by the erstwhile BTAD authority since 2011 to February, 2020 through contractual work orders to the Contractors/Suppliers, etc. under various entrusted departments of BTC without corresponding budget provisions

WHEREAS the outstanding liabilities created by the erstwhile BTAD authority are required to undergo detail examination and verification in the context of proposals of such works made, NIT, selection of successful bidders, quality of works, completion of works, fund position, part payment, etc.

WHEREAS it is further noticed that a good number of court cases have been filed before the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court as well as in the District Courts of respective District Jurisdictions under BTAD by the Contractors/Suppliers, etc. praying for release of payments to the Contractors/Suppliers, etc. against their respective work orders

WHEREAS, reportedly, out of the aforesaid contractual works, some part payments also made against portion of works completed by the Contractors/Suppliers, etc. by the Page No.# 5/6

erstwhile BTAD authority in certain cases. However, such fund flow does not follow any rationale and is found to be arbitrant

AND THEREFORE, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the BTC has decided to verify all such works by conducting comprehensive audit, financial verification and physical verification wherever applicable, against all such contractual works in the Govt. level and further to complete the whole exercise in this regard within 6 (six) months from the date of issue of this order. After verifying the same, if it is found that the claims are admissible after following all established financial norms, the same shall be processed in accordance with law and as per decision contained in Tamsher Ali and others vs. State of Assam and others reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1 accordingly. Furthermore, if instances of wrongdoing or misappropriation are found during such comprehensive audit, financial verification and physical verification wherever applicable, appropriate legal action would be taken against the persons/agencies/firms concerned in accordance with the applicable laws.

This order shall come into force with immediate effect."

6. Mr. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner having gone through the order dated 15.11.2021, has submitted that the process regarding payment of the outstanding dues to the petitioner shall be completed within the stipulated time period as mentioned in the said order.

7. Having considered the contents of the said order dated 15.11.2021; the decision of the Full Bench judgment of this Court, rendered on 29.09.2008, in Writ Appeal No. 484/2005 [ Tamsher Ali and Ors. vs. State of Assam and Ors .], and similar other 194 writ petitions reported in 2008 [4] GLT 1 [FB]; and considering the fact that the petitioner has already been paid an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- out of the total contract value of Rs. 15,00,000/-, it is considered appropriate that the respondent authorities in the BTC shall undertake and complete similar kind of exercise, like the one mentioned in the order dated Page No.# 6/6

15.11.2021, in respect of the claim of the petitioner also within a period of 3 [three] months. If after such exercise, the petitioner is found entitled to the amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- or any other amount, the same shall be released in favour of the petitioner in terms of the decision in Tamsher Ali [supra]. The petitioner shall submit a certified copy of this order to the respondent no. 3 i.e. the Principal Secretary, Bodoland Territorial Council [BTC], Kokrajhar within 7 [seven] days from today for his doing the needful.

8. The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the above observation and direction.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter