Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2300 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2022
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010114792022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1742/2022
M/S MALPANI INDUSTRIES
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE SITUATED AT
BENGENAKHOWA, GOLAGHAT ASSAM AND ITS VENEER AND SAW MIL AT
DEHINGIA GAON, P.O. SILONIJAN, DIST. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN-786192.
VERSUS
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NEW INDIA ASSURANCE BUILDING
87 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, MUMBAI ITS NORTH EAST REGIONAL
OFFICE AT ULUBARI G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, AND BRANCH
OFFICE AT JORHAT, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D K MISHRA
Advocate for the Respondent : MRS. D MAZUMDAR
Linked Case : CRP/66/2021
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NEW INDIA ASSURANCE BUILDING 87
MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
MUMBAI ITS NORTH EAST REGIONAL OFFICE AT ULUBARI G.S. ROAD
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
AND BRANCH OFFICE AT JORHAT
Page No.# 2/3
ASSAM
VERSUS
M/S MALPANI INDUSTRIES
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE SITUATED AT
BENGENAKHOWA
GOLAGHAT ASSAM AND ITS VENEER AND SAW MIL AT DEHINGIA GAON
P.O. SILONIJAN
DIST. GOLAGHAT
ASSAM
PIN-786192
------------
Advocate for : MR. R K BHATRA
Advocate for : MR D K MISHRA appearing for M/S MALPANI INDUSTRIES
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 30.06.2022.
Heard Mr. P.J. Borah, learned counsel for applicant. Also heard Ms. P. Hujuri, learned counsel for the insurance company.
This application has been filed for correction of typographical errors that appeared in the judgment and order dated 05.04.2022 passed by this Court in IA(Civil)No. 215/2022.
In paragraph No. 4 of the said judgment, it has been stated that the opposite party/insurance company filed a review petition praying for review of the judgment and order dated 27.11.2015. It has been submitted that present applicant M/s Malpani Industries had filed the said review petition not the insurance company.
Page No.# 3/3
It is also submitted that in paragraph No. 5 of the said order, it has been submitted that the insurance company filed special leave petition before the Supreme Court, whereas it should have been the present applicant M/s Malpani Industries.
I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by both the counsels.
The errors are typographical errors and therefore, they are corrected accordingly.
Henceforth, in paragraph No.4 of the said judgment and order dated 05.04.2022 passed by this Court in I/A(Civil) No.215/2022, the phrase "opposite party/insurance company shall be read as M/s Malpani Industries. Similarly, the phrase "insurance company" appearing in the paragraph No. 5 of the said order shall be read as M/s Malpani Industries.
Accordingly, the errors are corrected. Henceforth, this order shall form a part of the order dated 05.04.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.(Civil) No.215/2021.
With the aforesaid directions, the I/A stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!