Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2606 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2022
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010237882018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MACApp./410/2022
SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
1000-E/8 RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPURA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN
302022 AND HAVING A BRANCH OFFICE AT B.R. ARCADE 3RD FLOOR 21,
JANAPATH, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI 781007
VERSUS
SMTI ANIMA BORO AND 7 ORS
W/O LATE BIJOY BORO, R/O VILL. PATGAON (DHANINPARA), P.O.
BONGORA, P.S. AZARA, DIST. KAMRUP (R), ASSAM, PIN 781017
2:MST. RAHUL BORO
S/O LATE BIJOY BORO
R/O VILL. PATGAON (DHANINPARA)
P.O. BONGORA
P.S. AZARA
DIST. KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN 781017
3:MST. BAKUL BORO
S/O LATE BIJOY BORO
R/O VILL. PATGAON (DHANINPARA)
P.O. BONGORA
P.S. AZARA
DIST. KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN 781017
RESPONDENT NOS 2 AND 3 BEING MINOR ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR
LEGAL GUARDIAN MOTHER I.E. RESPONDENT NO. 1
Page No.# 2/4
4:MD. SAHIDUL HAQUE
S/O SHAD UDDIN
R/O VILL. TINTIKRI
HAILARA
P.S. KATIGORAH
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788805
5:MD. ABU HUSSAIN AHMED
S/O SHAD UDDIN
R/O VILL. TINTIKRI
HAILARA
P.S. KATIGORAH
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788805
6:DIBAKAR YADAV
C/O SRI GOPENDRA ROY
R/O VILL. PANONGHAT
P.S. DHOLAI
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788114
7:THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
DIVISIONAL OFFICE
CLUB ROAD CAPITAL TRAVELS BUILDING
P.O. SILCHAR-1
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE G.S. ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI 78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R GOSWAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B K JAIN
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
30.07.2022 Page No.# 3/4
Heard Mr. R. Goswami, the learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. B. K. Jain, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Ms. S. Musahary, learned counsel for the respondent No. 8.
This is an appeal against the judgment and award dated 21.12.2017 passed by the learned Member, MACT, No. 3, Kamrup, Guwahati, in MAC Case No. 246/2014.
Appeal is admitted.
Call for the records.
Issue notice returnable after six weeks.
It is submitted by Mr. Goswami, learned counsel for the appellant that the respondent No. 7 is not a necessary party and accordingly his name may be struck off from the array of parties. Prayer is allowed. Registry to correct the same including in the CIS system.
The appellant to take steps for issuance of notice upon the respondents by way of registered post with A/D as well as by usual process within a period of seven days from today.
As the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are represented by Mr. B. K. Jain, learned counsel and respondent No. 8 is represented by Ms. S. Musahary, learned counsel, no formal notice need be issued to the said respondents. However, extra copies be furnished to the learned counsel for the respondents within a period of three days from today.
List this matter after six weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry.
Page No.# 4/4
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!