Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1277 Gua
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2022
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010180392019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/240/2019
SRI DIPANKAR LAHKAR
S/O- LT. BIPIN CHANDRA LAHKAR, VILL.- MAZGAON, RATANPUR, P.O.-
MAHABHAIRAB, TEZPUR, DIST.- SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784001.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
IRRIGATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 6.
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
IRRIGATION DEPTT.
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
GHY- 3.
3:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
DEPTT. OF IRRIGATION
TEZPUR CIRCLE
TEZPUR
DIST.- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784001.
4:TRIBENI THENGAL
D/O- SRI TAJNESWAR THENGAL
VILL.- RATANPUR GAON
P.O.- BORNAHJAN
P.S.- TITABOR
DIST.- JORHAT
ASSAM, PIN-785630.
5:SANTA BHATTACHARJEE
C/O- MR. RUDRAJIT BHATTACHARJEE
Page No.# 2/3
NEAR BIRUBARI
KALIMANDIR
UDAYPUR
LANE NO. 3
H/ NO.- 8
ASHIRBAD KUNJ
P.O.- GOPINATH NAGAR
GHY- 16
DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM.
6:SILVIA RAHMAN
IRRIGATION COLONY
FLAT - II
UNIT- IV
CHANDMARI
GHY- 3
DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM.
7:SEHNAZ RAHMAN
C/O- MD. AMIR HUSSAIN MOLLAH
MATHURA NAGAR
DR. Z.H. ROAD
1ST BYE LANE
P.O.- DISPUR
DIST.- KAMRUP
ASSAM, PIN- 781006
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H LASKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
08.04.2022 [N. Kotiswar Singh, J.]
Heard Mr. N. Nath, learned counsel assisted by Mr. P.K. Deka, for the appellant. Also heard Mr. N. Upadhyay, learned standing counsel, Irrigation Department, appearing for respondent Nos.1--3; Mr. P.K. Roychoudhury, learned counsel along with Mr. N. Haque, Page No.# 3/3
appearing for respondent Nos.5 & 7 and Mr. M.A.I. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6.
Hearing is concluded.
Judgment is reserved.
Mr. Upadhyay, learned standing counsel, Irrigation Department, was directed to produce the record relating to the marks obtained by the petitioner in the recruitment process. Mr. Upadhyay, however, submits that he has not been able to trace out those records except the merit lists prepared in respect of the zone wise selection process. The fact that the name of the petitioner does not figure in the merit list of Tezpur zone, which indicates invariably that there were 5 meritorious candidates than the appellant and as such unless the appellant performs well in the examination, question of appointment also does not arise.
However, it has been fairly submitted by Mr. Upadhyay that at this point of time he is not in a position to produce the relevant records.
Sd/- Nani Tagia Sd/- N. Kotiswar Singh
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!