Padumi Thakuria vs The State Of Assam And 7 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 2370 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2370 Gua
Judgement Date : 29 September, 2021

Gauhati High Court

Padumi Thakuria vs The State Of Assam And 7 Ors on 29 September, 2021

                                                                      Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010147062021




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/4973/2021

         PADUMI THAKURIA
         W/O- LT. JIBA KRISHNA THAKURIA, R/O- VILL- PIJUPARA, P.O. AND P.S.
         NAGARBERA, DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781127



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
         REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION
         DEPTT., (ELEMENTARY), DISPUR, GHY-6

         2:THE DIRECTOR
          ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
         ASSAM
          KAHILIPARA
          GHY-19

         3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
          KAMRUP
         AMINGAON
          GHY-35

         4:THE DY. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
         AMINGAON
          KAMRUP
          GHY-35

         5:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
          CHAMARIA BLOCK
          DIST.- KAMRUP
         ASSAM
          CHAMARIA- 781136
                                                                     Page No.# 2/2

            6:THE TREASURY OFFICER
            AMINGAON
             GHY-35

            7:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION
            ASSAM
             DISPUR
             GHY-6

            8:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E)
            ASSAM
             MAIDAMGAON
             BELTOLA
             GHY-2

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. R M CHOUDHURY

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU




                                 BEFORE
            HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

                                        ORDER

Date : 29/09/2021

On the prayer of Mr. B. Kaushik, learned counsel for the respondent Elementary Education Department, list in the next week. Mr. B. Kaushik, learned counsel states that the claim of the petitioner had already been answered by the Court in the judgment in another writ petition.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant