Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2778 Gua
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2021
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010002222017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP/29/2021
CHANDAN PAUL CHOUDHURY @ MANOJ PAUL CHOUDHURY and ANR.
S/O LATE MAKHAN LAL PAUL CHOUDHURY, R/O WARD NO.2, P.M. DUTTA
ROAD, DHUBRI TOWN, P.O- DHUBRI, P.S- DHUBRI, DISTRICT- DHUBRI,
ASSAM, PIN- 783301
2: ON THE DEATH OF TAPAS PAUL CHOUDHURY @ MALAY PAUL
CHOUDHURY HIS LEGAL HEIRS
DHUBRI DISTRICT
2.1: SMTI PUSHPALATA PAUL CHOUDHURY
W/O LATE TAPAS PAUL CHOUDHURY @ MALAY PAUL CHOUDHURY
R/O WARD NO.2
P.M. DUTTA ROAD
DHUBRI TOWN
P.O.-DHUBRI
P.S.-DHUBRI
DISTRICT-DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-783301
2.2: MANOJIT PAUL CHOUDHURY
S/O LATE TAPAS PAUL CHOUDHURY @ MALAY PAUL CHOUDHURY
R/O WARD NO.2
P.M. DUTTA ROAD
DHUBRI TOWN
P.O.-DHUBRI
P.S.-DHUBRI
DISTRICT-DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-783301
2.3: BINAYAK PAUL CHOUDHURY
S/O LATE TAPAS PAUL CHOUDHURY @ MALAY PAUL CHOUDHURY
R/O WARD NO.2
Page No.# 2/3
P.M. DUTTA ROAD
DHUBRI TOWN
P.O.-DHUBRI
P.S.-DHUBRI
DISTRICT-DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-78330
VERSUS
ON DEATH OF RATHINDRA NATH DUTTA HIS LEGAL HEIR JAYA DUTTA
and 2 ORS.
R/O B.A. 128, SALTLAKE, P.O- BIDHAN NAGAR, KOLKATA
2:SRI ATINDRA NATH DUTTA
S/O LATE UPENDRA NATH DUTTA
R/O- 757 BLOCK-P
P.O-NEW ALIPUR
KOLKATA-53
3:SRI DIBAKAR MAZUMDAR
S/O LATE SITESH CH. MAZUMDAR
WARD NO.4
DHUBRI TOWN
P.O-DHUBRI
P.S- DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN- 78330
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.P SAHARIA
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 10/11/2021
Heard Mr. P.Mahanta, the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. H.K. Sarma for the respondents.
The instant revision application is admitted for hearing.
Page No.# 3/3
The parties are duly represented by their learned counsels.
Call for the LCR from both the Courts below.
The matter may be listed for orders pursuant to receipt of the LCR. Registry should take appropriate steps in this regard.
I have also heard Mr. P. Mahanta, who submits that the impugned judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the Trial Court suffers from illegality as well as the Courts below have exercised jurisdiction with material irregularity and this aspect of the matter could be seen as the Courts below mis-read the evidence in totality. I have perused the impugned judgments and decrees passed by the Appellate Court as well as the Trial Court.
I am of the opinion that in view of the admission of the instant revision application, it would be a fit case for stay of the impugned judgment and decree dated 07/04/2015 passed in Title Appeal No. 85/2011. Accordingly, the impugned judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Court is stayed.
Taking into consideration that this is a landlord tenant dispute of the year 2009, Mr. Sahewalla, the leaned Senior Counsel submits that the matter may be disposed of as expeditiously as possible. In view of that, the Registry is directed to take expeditious steps for requisition of the LCR.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!