Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ayub Ali vs The State Of Assam
2021 Latest Caselaw 1531 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1531 Gua
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Ayub Ali vs The State Of Assam on 27 April, 2021
                                                                       Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010044342021




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                   Case No. : AB/824/2021

            AYUB ALI
            S/O. DILDAR ALI, VILL. PACHIM BILASHPUR, P.S. DHALIGAON, DIST.
            CHIRANG, BTR, ASSAM, PIN-783385.



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM
            REP. BY PP, ASSAM.



Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A M AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM




             Linked Case : AB/702/2021

            JAKIR ALI
            S/O DILDAR ALI
             VILL-PACHIM BILASHPUR
             P.S.-DHALIGAON
             DIST-CHIRANG
             BTR (ASSAM)
             PIN-783385


             VERSUS
                                                                     Page No.# 2/4

            THE STATE OF ASSAM
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
            ASSAM


            ------------
            Advocate for : MR. A M AHMED
            Advocate for : PP
            ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM



                                     BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                     ORDER

Date : 27.04.2021

Heard Mr. A. Motin, learned counsel for both the petitioners in AB No. 824/2021 and AB No. 702/2021 and Mr. T.K.Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

By these two applications preferred under Section 438, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), the petitioner in AB No. 824/2021 viz. Ayub Ali and the petitioner in AB No. 702/2021 viz. Jakir Ali have approached this Court seeking the benefit of pre-arrest bail, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Dhaligaon Police Station Case No. 53/2021 registered for offences under Sections 379/411, Indian Penal Code (IPC) read with Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with Section 23 of the Petroleum Act, 1934.

The concerned case diary was called for by earlier orders dated 08.03.2021, 16.03.2021, 22.03.2021, 05.04.2021 and 22.04.2021 but the case diary has not been produced till date.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the concerned case diary could not be produced on those dates as well as today as the Page No.# 3/4

Investigating Officer of the case is undergoing treatment.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offence under Section 7, Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the offence under Section 23 of the Petroleum Act, 1934 are bailable in nature. He has further submitted that no complaint has been received that the alleged petroleum products involved in the case have been stolen from any place. Submitting as above, he has prayed for interim protection pending further consideration on the basis of the materials in the case diary, as and when the same is produced.

I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. The offence under Section 7, Essential Commodities Act, 1955 has been held to be bailable by the judgment and order dated 27.11.2017 passed by division bench of this Court in AB no. 1205/2017 [ Jayanta Kumar Das vs. the State of Assam]. Similarly, in Kailash Kumar Agarwalla vs. the State of Assam , reported in 2004 (2) GLT 347, the offence under Section 23(1)(a), Petroleum Act, 1934 has been held to be bailable.

In view of non-production of the case diary on several occasions, as stated above, and in view of the afore-stated position of law, it is provided, in the interim, that in the event of the petitioners in connection with Dhaligaon Police Station Case No. 53/2021 they shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with one local surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject to the conditions that :

1. The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of 10 (ten) days from today and shall cooperate with the investigation of the case;

Page No.# 4/4

2. The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

3. The petitioners shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police.

List the case on 28.05.2021 to enable learned Additional Public Prosecutor to produce the concerned case diary on that date.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter