Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2533 Del
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2022
$~37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: 12.10.2022
+ W.P.(C) 14445/2022 & CM. APPL. 44065/2022
SANJAY KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber and Mr. Nikunj
Arora, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .... Respondents
Through: Ms. Reema Khorana, Sr. Panel
Counsel with Mr. Vikash Kumar, Mr.
Garvil Singh, Advocates and Mr.
Chitvan Singhal, GP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
J U D G M E N T (oral)
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing the letter
dated 31.08.2022 issued by the respondents rejecting the request of the
petitioner for grant of pro rata pension; a writ of mandamus directing the
respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the
date of his discharge with all consequential benefits i.e. 28.05.1998 in terms
of judgment dated 24.11.2020 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P. (C)
No.98/2020 as well as other judgments passed by this Court as well as the
Hon'ble Supreme Court.
2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled in the Indian Air Force on
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PREM BALA CHHABRA Signing Date:14.10.2022 15:21 18.01.1988 and underwent required training successfully. Petitioner had
appeared in the interview and was selected to the post of Probationary
Officer in Associate Bank of SBI (State Bank of Patiala) after obtaining "No
Objection Certificate" dated 03.11.1997 from respondents. The petitioner
was offered to join the above-said post in Associate Bank of SBI, State Bank
of Patiala in terms of appointment letter dated 17.04.1998. The petitioner
stood discharged from the services of IAF on 28.05.1998 after rendering
regular service of 10 years, 04 months and 10 days.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of Office
Memorandum No. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.07.2005 and in terms
with Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees
of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension and that in
view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 rendered in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016,
titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors., which has
been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant
pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for their past services in Air
Force.
4. Notice issued.
5. Ms. Reema Khorana, learned Senior Panel Counsel has entered
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PREM BALA CHHABRA Signing Date:14.10.2022 15:21 appearance on behalf of the respondents and has submitted that the case of
petitioner shall be considered and his pro-rata pension shall be released, if he
is found eligible.
6. Upon hearing, learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the
material placed on record, we find that this Court in W.P.(C) No.
10026/2016, titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors.,
has granted pro-rata pension and the case of the petitioner herein is similar
thereto.
7. In view of the above, we dispose of the present petition with direction
to respondents to consider the case of petitioner and release pro-rata
pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment
dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No.10026/2016 and judgment dated
08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.
8. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of.
Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE
(SAURABH BANERJEE) JUDGE
OCTOBER 12, 2022/rk
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PREM BALA CHHABRA Signing Date:14.10.2022 15:21
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!