Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bimal Mangar And Ors vs Union Of India & Ors.
2022 Latest Caselaw 2301 Del

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2301 Del
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2022

Delhi High Court
Bimal Mangar And Ors vs Union Of India & Ors. on 27 July, 2022
$~4, 5 & 9
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                                           Date of decision: July 27, 2022
+       W.P.(C) 7655/2022
        BHAGWAN PRASAD & ORS.                                 .... Petitioners
                                 Through:   Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate

                                 versus

        UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                 .... Respondents
                                 Through:   Mr. Shrey Sharawat and Mr. Sahaj
                                            Garg, Advocates

+       W.P.(C) 8151/2022
        BIMAL MANGAR AND ORS                                  .... Petitioners
                                 Through:   Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate

                                 versus

        UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                 .... Respondents
                                 Through:   Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary, Senior Panel
                                            Counsel with Mr. Tarveen Singh, GP
                                            and Mr. Deepak Gautam, Advocate
+       W.P.(C) 3930/2022
        SANGAPPA ABYAL                                        ..... Petitioner
                                 Through:   Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate

                                 versus

        UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                 .... Respondents
                                 Through:   Mr. Rishabh Sahu, CGSC with Mr.
                                            Sameer Sharma, Advocate

W.P.(C) 7655/2022 & connected petitions                                          Page 1 of 4
         CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

                                 J U D G M E N T (oral)

1. The issue(s) raised in these petitions and the relief(s) sought are

similar, therefore, these petitions are heard together and being disposed of

by this common judgment.

2. Vide W.P.(C) 7655/2022, petitioners seek directions to the

respondents to reckon date of assumption of charge by petitioners to the post

of Sub Inspector (Ministerial) with effect from date of promotion of

petitioners to post of Sub- Inspector (Ministerial) and consequently grant

one increment on 01.01.2006 in the pre-revised pay scale and thereafter next

increment in the revised pay structure on 01.07.2006 in terms of paragraph 3

of office memorandum dated 19.03.2012 and other consequential benefits.

3. Vide W.P.(C) 8151/2022, petitioners seek directions to the

respondents to reckon date of assumption of charge by petitioners to the

rank of Head Constable (Ministerial) with effect from date of their

appointment in said rank i.e. 01.12.2006 and thereafter grant one increment

to the petitioners in the rank of Head Constable (Ministerial) on 01.07.2007

and re-fix their pay on said basis and consequently release arrears of pay to

the petitioners.

4. Vide W.P.(C) 3930/2022, petitioner seeks directions to the

respondents to reckon date of assumption of charge by petitioner to the post

of Sub Inspector (Ministerial) with effect from 09.06.2000 (date of

promotion of petitioner to post of Sub- Inspector (Ministerial) and

consequently grant one increment on 01.01.2006 in the pre-revised pay scale

and thereafter next increment in the revised pay structure on 01.07.2006 in

terms of paragraph 3 of office memorandum dated 19.03.2012 and other

consequential benefits.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue at hand is

covered by a judgment of the coordinate Division Bench of this Court in

W.P. (C) No. 4448/2016 titled as 'Vijayan V.V. vs. Union of India and

others' decided on 01.04.2019.

6. Since the legal issue involved in the present writ petition stands

finally settled by the judgment of this Court in W.P. (C) No. 4448/2016, this

Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the

present writ petitions pending. Accordingly, this Court directs the

respondents to treat the present writ petitions filed by the petitioners as

representations in accordance with the judgment of this Court in W.P. (C)

No. 4448/2016 and decide the same by way of a reasoned order within six

weeks.

7. With aforesaid directions, these three petitions stand disposed of.

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

(SAURABH BANERJEE) JUDGE JULY 27, 2022/rk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter