Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 577 Del
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2021
$~31
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: February 19, 2021
+ CRL.M.C. 538/2021 & Crl.M.A. 2695-96/2021
SATYAM KHANNA & ANR. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Haneef Mohd., Advocate
Versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional
Public Prosecutor for
respondent No.1/State with
Inspector Jagdeep Malik &
Inspector C P Singh
Respondent No.2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
% 19.02.2021
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. By this petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR
No.274/2016, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police
station Geeta Colony, Delhi and the proceedings emanating
therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for
State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present
through video conferencing and she has been identified as the
complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officers of this
case, who are also present through video conferencing.
4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken
up for final hearing.
5. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2
was solemnized on 14.10.2015 and due to temporal differences, the
marriage could not work and they started living separately since
14.12.2016. The dispute between the parties culminated into the FIR
in question.
6. The present petition has been filed on the ground that the
parties have amicably settled their dispute in terms of Settlement-
Agreement of 09.12.2019 arrived at Delhi High Court Mediation
and Conciliation Centre. It is stated that joint petition under Section
13 (1) (ia) and Section 13 B(2) under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
has been allowed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court,
Saket Courts, New Delhi and decree of divorce has been granted on
16.12.2020.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the terms of
Settlement-Agreement dated 09.12.2019 have been acted upon and
the balance amount of Rs.4,55,000/- has been paid to respondent
No.2/complainant. Respondent No.2, present through video
conferencing, affirms factum of receipt of balance amount and
submits she has 'no objection' to quashing of FIR in question.
8. Keeping in view that the dispute between the parties has been
amicably resolved, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in
question, as no useful purpose would be served in continuing with
the proceedings arising out of the present FIR.
9. For the reasons afore noted, FIR No.274/2016, under Sections
498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Geeta Colony, Delhi
and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby
quashed.
10. The petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of. Pending
applications also stand disposed of.
11. The order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE FEBRUARY 19, 2021 r
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!