Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishal Vashisht & Others vs State Of Delhi & Anr.
2019 Latest Caselaw 957 Del

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 957 Del
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2019

Delhi High Court
Vishal Vashisht & Others vs State Of Delhi & Anr. on 13 February, 2019
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                        Date of Order: February 13, 2019

+      CRL.M.C. 793/2019 & Crl.M.As. 3221-22/2019
       VISHAL VASHISHT & OTHERS               .....Petitioners
                    Through: Mr. D.Hasija, Advocate
                   Versus

       STATE OF DELHI & ANR.                              .....Respondents
                    Through:           Dr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public
                                       Prosecutor for respondent-State
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

                          ORDER

(ORAL)

Petitioner has been charge-sheeted under Section 394/34 IPC in FIR No. 32/2011, registered at police station Rajinder Nagar, Central District, Delhi. Against the order on Charge, petitioner had preferred a Revision Petition, which was dismissed by the Revisional Court vide order of 20th December, 2018 as time-barred.

Petitioner's counsel assails the impugned order of 9th December, 2014 on the ground that it discloses utter non-application of mind and the stand of petitioners has not been considered. It is submitted that no case under Section 394/34 IPC is made out and at best, the case made out against petitioner will come within the ambit of Section 323/34 IPC.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State supports the impugned order and submits that there is no infirmity in it.

Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned order, I do find that it is a cryptic order but after hearing petitioner's counsel and going through the FIR of this case, this Court finds that prima facie case under Section 394/34 IPC is made out against petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed while not commenting upon the merits of the case, lest it may prejudice petitioner at trial.

This petition and the applications are accordingly disposed of.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE FEBRUARY 13, 2019 r

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter