Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 6058 Del
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2017
$~ R-386
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decided on: 31st October, 2017
+ MAC.APP. 786/2011
RAMJI YADAV ..... Appellant
Through: None.
versus
RAJ KUMAR & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
1. The appellant had instituted Accident Claim case (MACT Case
No.650/10/06) on 23.09.2006 alleging that he had suffered injury in
the motor vehicular accident which took place on 21.04.2006 on being
hit by bus bearing registration No. HP-34A-5428 (the bus) which,
according to his case, was driven in a rash manner, reference being
made to corresponding criminal case vide First Information Report
bearing No.126/06 in Police Station Alipur. The Tribunal held inquiry
and, by judgment dated 03.05.2011, returned a finding holding that the
claimant had failed to prove that he had suffered injuries on account of
negligent driving of the bus in a motor vehicular accident.
2. The appeal was filed seeking to assail the above said conclusion
wherefore the Tribunal has declined to grant any compensation. The
appeal was put in the list of 'Regulars' as per order dated 3 rd February,
2017. Noticeably, there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant
on that stage. When it is taken up for hearing again, there is no
appearance by the claimant.
3. On perusal, it is found that the Tribunal has referred to various
deficiencies in the evidence including the fact that there was a
statement initially made by the claimant before the police that he had
suffered injuries due to some quarrel. The Tribunal also found that the
criminal case record had been fabricated.
4. Against the above backdrop, there is no ground for interference.
5. The appeal is dismissed.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
OCTOBER 31 , 2017 ak
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!