Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harsh Gogia vs The State.Govt Nct Of Delhi & ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 1402 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1402 Del
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2017

Delhi High Court
Harsh Gogia vs The State.Govt Nct Of Delhi & ... on 15 March, 2017
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%
                                                     Decided on: 15.03.2017
+       TEST.CAS. 62/2013

        HARSH GOGIA                                         ..... Petitioner

                          Through: Ms Meena Chaudhary, Adv.

                          versus

        THE STATE.GOVT NCT OF DELHI & OTHERS ..... Respondents

                          Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The present petition under Section 270 of the Indian Succession Act

has been filed by Smt. Harsh Gogia for Probate of Will dated 18.11.2010 of

late Shri Santosh Bankshi, W/o Shri Vishwa Nath, in respect of her estate

DDA S.F.S. Flat bearing No.22, Neeti Bagh, New Delhi. The petitioner has

assessed the total value of the property at Rs. 80 lakhs. It is submitted that

the attesting witnesses of the said Will were Smt.Payal Malik, W/o Shri

Sudhir Shah, R/o A-704, Sukhsagar Apartments, 52, I.P. Extension, Delhi-

92 and it is submitted that the witnesses had signed the Will in the presence

of Testatrix and the Testatrix also signed the Will in their presence and the

Will was also registered in the office of Sub-Registrar, Delhi. It is submitted

Test Cas.62/2013 Page 1 that Smt. Santosh Bakshi expired on 22.12.2012 leaving behind Class-II

legal heirs. It is submitted that the Testatrix was a widow having no

children. It is submitted that all the legal heirs of Class-II, namely, Shri

Sudershan Kumar Malik, (Brother), Smt.Santosh Malik (Sister-in-law), Shri

Sharad Malik (Nephew), Smt.Madhuri Yadav (Niece), Smt.Payal Malik

(Niece) and Ms.Taruna Malik (Niece) have submitted their NOC's placed on

record.

2. The notices were issued to all the legal heirs. The citation was also

published in the 'Hindustan Times'. The Valuation Report was also sought

and the State had valued the property at Rs.46,92,000/-. All the legal heirs

have submitted their NOCs which were taken on record.

3. The petitioner has examined two witnesses, herself and the attesting

witness Smt. Payal Malik. In her affidavit, she has proved the death

certificate of Mrs. Santosh Bakshi as PW-1/1 and the original Will as PW-

1/2. PW-2 is the attesting witness of the Will. She has also filed her

evidence by way of affidavit and proved it as PW-2/A. She has also

identified her signatures on the said Will at Point 'A' and 'B' and of Smt.

Santosh Bakshi at point 'C', 'D', 'E' and 'F'. She has also deposed that Smt.

Santosh Bakshi signed the Will in her presence. She has also identified the

Test Cas.62/2013 Page 2 signature of another attesting witness of the Will, Shri Sanjay Sood at point

'G' and 'H' and has stated that he also put his signatures in the presence of

Testatrix. The petitioner in her testimony as PW-1 has also deposed that the

Will was duly registered.

4. I have heard the arguments and perused the records. The petitioner

has duly proved the execution of the Will by examining one attesting

witness who has clearly stated that the Testatrix signed the Will in her

presence and that she and other attesting witness also signed the Will in the

presence of Testatrix. Despite the citation, there was no objection to the said

Will. The other legal heirs have also furnished their no objection by way of

affidavits. Vide the said Will, the Testatrix has clearly stated that she was

the absolute owner of DDA S.F.S. Flat bearing No.22, Neeti Bagh, New

Delhi and bequeathed the said property in favour of Harsh Gogia, daughter

of her late brother Khairati Lal Malik.

5. Although in the said Will, the Testatrix had bequeathed another

property bearing number A-674 in Block A, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, but

the present petition has been filed in respect of property DDA S.F.S. Flat

bearing No.22, Neeti Bagh, New Delhi.

Test Cas.62/2013 Page 3

6. In K.M. Varghese and Ors vs. K.M. Oommen and Ors. AIR (1994)

85, the Division Bench has clearly held that a petition for grant of Letters of

Administration does not suffer with any infirmity even if the entire property

scheduled in the Will is not included and the Courts are not devoid of

jurisdiction to grant Letters of Administration. I am, therefore, of the view

that the Court has the jurisdiction in the present case as well to grant the

probate of the Will dated 18.11.2010.

7. Accordingly, the probate of the Will dated 18.11.2010 is granted in

favour of the petitioner in respect of the property bearing DDA S.F.S. Flat

bearing No.22, Neeti Bagh, New Delhi, subject to her paying the requisite

court fee on the valuation of Rs. 46,92,000/- and furnishing administrative

bond with one surety to the satisfaction of the Registrar General.

8. The petition stands disposed of.




                                                          DEEPA SHARMA
                                                             (JUDGE)

MARCH 15, 2017
BG




Test Cas.62/2013                                                         Page 4
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter