Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Saroj Devi vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr.
2017 Latest Caselaw 936 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 936 Del
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2017

Delhi High Court
Smt. Saroj Devi vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 17 February, 2017
*            IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                  W.P.(C) Nos.989/2010 & 5196/2010

%                                                17th February, 2017

1.           W.P.(C) No.989/2010

SMT. SAROJ DEVI                                       ..... Petitioner
                          Through:       Mr. C.S.S. Tomar, Advocate.
                          versus

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.            ..... Respondents
                   Through: Ms. Niti Jain, Advocate.

2.           W.P.(C) No.5196/2010

SMT. SAROJ BALA                                       ..... Petitioner
                          Through:       Mr. C.S.S. Tomar, Advocate.
                          versus

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.            ..... Respondents
                   Through: Ms. Niti Jain, Advocate.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?


VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

W.P.(C) No.989/2010

1.           By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of being regularized in her

employment with the respondent no.2/school and with which school



W.P.(C) Nos.989/2010 & 5196/2010                              Page 1 of 7
 petitioner was working as a part time water woman. The respondent

no.2/school is an aided school.


2.           The facts of the case are that petitioner was appointed to

the respondent no.2/school as a water woman with the approval of the

respondent no.1/Director of Education (DOE) in terms of the letter of

the respondent no.1/DOE dated 17.12.1976. This letter dated

17.12.1976 reads as under:-

                " OFFICE OF THE EDUCATION OFFICER,
       ZONE IV BOYS, KAMLA MARKET, ZEENAT MAHAL, NEW
                                     DELHI
     No. ZONE,IV BOYS/7310                        DATED 17/12/76
     To,
     The Head Master
     Nehru Memorial Co-Edu Middle School
     Mandoli Road, Shahdara, Delhi.
     SUB: APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT OF PART-TIME SWEEPER
     OR WATER WOMEN.
     Sir,
     With reference to your consequences on the subject dated above. The
     Director of Education, Delhi has been pleased to accord approval of
     appointment of Smt. Parkashi Devi as Part Time, Sweepers and Smt.
     Saroj Devi as part time water woman @ Rs.65/- fixed p.m. with effect
     from 01-09-76.
                                                           Yours faithfully
                                                                       Sd/-
                                                               H.K. Arora
                                                         Education Officer
                                                             Zone IV boys
     Note:
     Copy forwarded to the Accts. Officer, Granted-in-aid Directorate of
     Education for information and necessary action.
                                                     EDUCATION OFFICER
                                                         ZONE IV BOYS"


3.           Petitioner pleads that the respondent no.1/DOE came out

with a circular dated 22.7.2009 whereby the respondent no.1/DOE

W.P.(C) Nos.989/2010 & 5196/2010                                Page 2 of 7
 ordered that services of part time workers against regular vacant

Group-D posts be regularized and petitioner is entitled to the benefit of

this circular of the respondent no.1/DOE dated 22.7.2009 more so by

virtue of Section 10 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, and

which section provides that service conditions of employees of private

aided schools have to be the same as the service conditions of

employees in government schools. The order/circular dated 22.7.2009

reads as under:-

        "GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF
      DELHI DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, ESTABLISHMENT-I
          SECTION ROOM NO.211-D, OLD SECTT., DELHI-110054.
     No.F.DE 1 (16) (3) 2006/E.I./12770-12785
     DATED: 22/07/2009
                                        ORDER

The Director of Education, Govt, of N.C.T. of Delhi is pleased to regularize the services of following Part-time workers against the regular vacant Group-D posts of Waterman/women in the pay scale of Rs.2,550- 3,200/- (Pre-revised) plus usual allowances as admissible under the Rules from time to time, in the terms of relevant provisions as contained in the approved Recruitment Rules for Group-D posts notified vide Services Department's Notification No. F 2/14/87-S-II dated 10.06.1997. Their appointment to designated Group-D post shall be deemed from the date they actually report for duty after they have been medically examined and found fit by the Medical Board, Deen Upadhayay Hospital, New Delhi. Their appointment will be further subject to verification of their character and antecedents satisfactory by the concerned Authority and fulfillment of all Codal formalities.

3. Before appointment of these part-time employees to regular Group-D post, the concerned appointing Authority should satisfy themselves that:

(i) The part-time employee was within the prescribed age limit of 18-25 years (relax-able for SC/ST/OBC as per general orders on the subject) on the date of his/her engagement as part-time employee.

(ii) Documentary proof of date of birth. The date of birth once entered in the service book shall not be liable to change under any circumstances.

(iii) Documentary proof of their belonging to SC/ST/OBC where ever applicable.

(iv) Part time employee was paid of Contingency fund and was working against sanctioned part-time post and was engaged through Employment Exchange.

4. A certificate may be recorded in the Appointment Order/Service Book of each candidate that he/she was within the prescribed age limit on the date of his/her engagement as part-time employee to avoid any future complications in this regard.

5. The Appointing Authority should get verified the particulars and obtain Work & Conduct Report of Part-time employees from the concerned Principal which would form part of his/her personal file.

6. Consequent upon the regularization of their services against regular vacant Group-D post, these candidates are nominated and posted to the Schools shown against their names for their appointment to the post of Waterman/Woman Full time Group-D (regular).

No.F DE 1 (16) (3) 2006/E.I./12770-12785 DATED: 22/07/2007 Copy for information and necessary action, forwarded to:-

1) All Regional Director of Education, Directorate of Education, Delhi.

2) All Deputy of Director of Education, Director of Education, Delhi with the direction to complete the codal formalities as described above in connection with appointment after satisfied with the reasonable aspects in all respect as such no ineligible incumbent has been given appointment.

3) Additional Director of Education (School)/Chairman of Screening Committee.

4) A.D.E. (Vigilance)/Member of Screening Committee.

5) A.D.E. (Exam)/Member of Screening Committee.

6) P.S. to Director of Education, Directorate of Education, Director of Education, Delhi.

7) P.A. to Additional Director of Education (Admn) Directorate of Education, Delhi.

8) The Superintendent (I.T.), Directorate of Education, Old Sectt., Delhi with the request to place the Order on the website of this Directorate after log in.

     9)      Guard file.

                                                     (SANJAY KAUSHIK)
                                                 ASST. DIR. OF EDN.(E.I.)"


4. A reading of the counter affidavit filed by the respondent

no.1/DOE in the present case shows that there is no dispute that there

was in fact a circular issued by the respondent no.1/DOE dated

22.7.2009. Respondent no.1/DOE only contends that the petitioner

was only appointed on temporary basis and hence she is not entitled to

get regular appointment. However, the stand of the respondent

no.1/DOE of not granting of regularization on account of petitioner

being a part time employee hits at the very language of the circular of

the respondent no.1/DOE dated 22.7.2009 (which has been reproduced

above) as per which the part time workers only were to be regularized

as long as they were working for the Group-D posts of water

man/women. Petitioner admittedly was working as a water woman on

part time basis and it is not the case of the respondent no.1/DOE that

petitioner was not working in a sanctioned post of a water woman

because petitioner's appointment was approved by the respondent

no.1/DOE itself as per its letter dated 17.12.1976. The only defence of

the respondent no.1/DOE is that the petitioner was working as a part

time employee and such part-time employees cannot be regularized.

5. In view of the above facts which show that petitioner is

entitled to the benefit of the circular of the respondent no.1/DOE dated

22.7.2009 read with Section 10 of the Delhi School Education Act,

petitioner hence will be confirmed in the post of water woman in terms

of the circular of the respondent no.1/DOE dated 22.7.2009. Petitioner

is accordingly regularized with the respondent no.2/school w.e.f

22.7.2009 and hence petitioner will be entitled to all consequential

benefits.

6. Writ petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of in

terms of aforesaid observations.

W.P.(C) No.5196/2010

7. The reliefs prayed in this writ petition are identical to the

reliefs prayed in W.P.(C) No.989/2010, however, reliefs in this writ

petition cannot be granted because the school in the present case in

which petitioner was working as a part time water woman being Guru

Nanak Girls Middle School/respondent no.2 was only entitled to have

two full time employees and two part time employees in Group-D

posts because respondent no.2's school enrolment was below 400, and

already in the respondent no.2/school there existed two part time and

two full time employees in Group-D posts already working, when the

petitioner was appointed. Hence there was no sanctioned post available

so far as the petitioner/Smt. Saroj Bala is concerned to which she was

appointed and once there is no sanctioned post, then there cannot be

regularization of a person working in a post which is not a sanctioned

post inasmuch as the circular of the respondent no.1/DOE dated

22.7.2009 only applies to regular vacant Group-D post.

8. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed, leaving the

parties to bear their own costs.

FEBRUARY 17, 2017                         VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
Ne





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter