Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Beena Devi & Ors. vs Hdfc Ergo Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. & Ors.
2017 Latest Caselaw 4293 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4293 Del
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2017

Delhi High Court
Beena Devi & Ors. vs Hdfc Ergo Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. & Ors. on 21 August, 2017
$~9
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                          Decided on: 21st August, 2017
+      MAC APPEAL No. 137/2017

       BEENA DEVI & ORS.                            .... Appellants
                     Through:           Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv.

                           versus

       HDFC ERGO GEN. INS. CO. LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents
                    Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-1.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

                      JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. Satender Singh, 32 years old, died as a result of injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 28.03.2013 due to negligent driving of car make Mahindra Scorpio bearing registration No. HR 51 W 9317, admittedly insured against third party risk with the first respondent (insurer). His wife and other members of the family dependent upon him, they being the appellants herein, instituted accident claim case (suit no. 250/2013) which was allowed by the tribunal vide judgment dated 21.07.2016 and compensation in the sum of Rs. 13,07,000/- was granted to the claimants / appellants, the liability being fastened on the insurance company (first respondent). The said amount includes non-pecuniary damages in the sum of Rs. 1 lakh towards loss of love & affection, Rs. 25,000/-

towards funeral expenses, Rs. 20,000/- towards loss to estate and Rs. 20,000/- towards loss of consortium.

2. The appellants are aggrieved by the said judgment and submit that the aforesaid non-pecuniary damages awarded are inadequate. Following the view taken in MAC.APP.No.160/2015 Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Usha decided by this court on 05.05.2016, the submission of the claimants/appellants is found to be correct.

3. Therefore, in lieu of the awards under the above heads granted by the tribunal, non-pecuniary damages in the sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- each towards loss of love & affection and towards loss of consortium and Rs. 50,000/- each towards loss of estate and funeral expense are added to the total compensation. Thus, the award would stand increased by (4,00,000 - 1,95,000) Rs. 2,05,000/-.

4. Given the dispensation in favour of other claimants, it is directed that the entire enhanced amount shall fall to the share of first appellant (Beena Devi), wife of the deceased it to be released with interest @ 9% per annum in the form of fixed deposit receipt for a period of seven years though with liberty given to her to draw monthly interest.

5. Insurer will be duty bound to deposit the enhanced portion with the tribunal within thirty days, making it available to be released.

6. The appeal stands disposed of in above terms.

R.K.GAUBA, J.

AUGUST 21, 2017 nk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter